论我国碳市场的法治困境与制度完善

发布时间：2018-06-22 02:37

本文选题：碳市场 + 法治　；参考：《价格理论与实践》2017年01期

【摘要】：我国碳市场法律治理已经形成了民商法调整、行政监管和交易所自律管理的现状。由于碳市场交易产品和交易模式的不断创新,民商事救济无法及时有效保障市场参与者的合法权益;碳市场规范性文件在法律位阶和行政授权上存在的缺陷,导致政府对碳市场的监管存在合法性疑问;碳交易所的非互助化趋势,产生了碳交易所自律管理的消极效果。基于我国碳市场的现实和法治建设需求,在碳市场的法律治理过程中,应在发挥民商法调整、行政监管和交易所自律管理的各自优势以及相互协调功能的同时,充实民商法规范中的特殊救济手段,进一步确立行政监管的合法性,完善碳交易所自律管理的权利、义务平衡机制。
[Abstract]:The current situation of civil and commercial law adjustment, administrative supervision and exchange self-discipline management has been formed in China's carbon market legal governance. Due to the continuous innovation of trading products and modes of trading in the carbon market, civil and commercial remedies cannot effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of market participants in a timely and effective manner, and there are defects in the legal rank and administrative authorization of the normative documents of the carbon market. As a result, the government has doubts about the legality of the regulation of the carbon market, and the trend of non-mutualization of carbon exchanges has produced the negative effect of self-regulation of carbon exchanges. Based on the reality of China's carbon market and the needs of legal construction, in the process of legal governance of carbon market, we should give full play to the respective advantages of civil and commercial law adjustment, administrative supervision and exchange self-discipline management, as well as the function of mutual coordination. Enrich the special relief means in the civil and commercial law norms, further establish the legitimacy of administrative supervision, perfect the rights and obligations balance mechanism of the self-regulation of carbon exchange.
【作者单位】：上海财经大学法学院;
【基金】：2014年度上海财经大学研究生创新基金项目“绿色债券法律机制研究”(项目批准号:CXJJ-2014-394)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.67

【相似文献】