城市房屋征收中强制执行问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-25 15:54

本文选题：房屋征收 + 强制执行　；参考：《广西师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,随着我国经济的快速发展和城市化进程的不断推进,房屋征收在全国成为普遍现象,房屋征收领域的矛盾也愈演愈烈。为了适应时代的要求,我国也相继制定并实施了一些旨在规范房屋征收的法律规范,但效果却不明显。本文在研究基本理论的基础上,对现阶段立法规范和个案实践进行分析,从立法和实践两个方面来阐述我国在房屋征收强制执行的现实情况,深刻挖掘其中出现的问题和不足,并提出个人的一些浅薄的建议。具体来说,文章分为五部分,第一部分是引言,介绍房屋征收强制执行的研究背景和意义、研究内容和方法。第二部分通过对理论上和法律上强制执行的概念进行分析,对强制执行的概念重新界定,并归纳出特征。对房屋征收理论基础的阐述,为发现目前制度的不足和提出完善建议指明方向。第三部分是城市房屋征收中强制执行的运行现状、问题揭示及其原因分析,从立法现状和实施现状两部分入手,发现我国目前房屋征收强制执行存在以下问题：执行主体不一致、责任规定不明确、执行程序不具体、救济途径不完善,其原因主要是法律规定不协调、司法地位不独立、相应制度不完善。第四部分是对国外征收制度的借鉴,通过介绍美国的土地征用制度和法国的土地征收制度,发现征收制度必须基于公共目的,经过正当程序并给与公正补偿政府才能限制公民的私有财产权,虽然我国实行的是土地国有、房屋私有的政策,但是国外的征收制度对我国房屋征收制度的完善提供了理论参考。第五部分是对完善房屋征收强制执行的思考,建议制定统一的规定、建立裁判和执行互相分离的行政强制执行模式、严格划分执行主体并对其责任作明确规定、规范强制执行的程序、完善救济途径五个方面提出完善建议。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of our economy and the process of urbanization, housing expropriation has become a common phenomenon throughout the country, and the contradictions in the field of housing collection have become increasingly fierce. In order to meet the needs of the times, our country has also formulated and implemented some legal norms aimed at standardizing the collection of houses, but the effect is not obvious. On the basis of studying the basic theory, this paper analyzes the current legislative norms and case practice, expounds the reality of the enforcement of housing expropriation in our country from the aspects of legislation and practice, and deeply excavates the problems and deficiencies. And put forward personal some shallow suggestions. Specifically, the article is divided into five parts, the first part is an introduction, introducing the research background and significance, research content and methods. In the second part, by analyzing the concept of enforcement in theory and law, the concept of enforcement is redefined and the characteristics are summed up. This paper expounds the theoretical basis of house expropriation, and points out the direction of finding out the deficiency of the present system and putting forward some perfect suggestions. The third part is the current situation of the enforcement of urban housing expropriation, the problems revealed and the analysis of the reasons, from the legislative status and implementation of the current situation of two parts, It is found that the following problems exist in the enforcement of housing expropriation in our country at present: the main body of execution is inconsistent, the responsibility regulation is not clear, the execution procedure is not specific, the remedy way is not perfect, the main reason is that the legal provisions are not coordinated and the judicial position is not independent. The corresponding system is not perfect. The fourth part is to draw lessons from the foreign expropriation system. By introducing the land expropriation system in the United States and the land expropriation system in France, it is found that the expropriation system must be based on public purposes. Only after due process and fair compensation can the government restrict the private property rights of citizens, although our country implements the policy of land ownership and private housing. But the foreign expropriation system provides a theoretical reference for the perfection of the housing expropriation system in our country. The fifth part is to perfect the house levy compulsory execution thought, proposes to make the unified stipulation, establishes the judgment and the execution mutually separate administrative compulsory execution pattern, strictly divides the execution main body and makes the clear stipulation to its responsibility. Standardizing the procedure of compulsory execution and perfecting the relief ways are put forward in five aspects.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1813

【参考文献】