我国草原行政处罚裁量基准制定的相关问题研究
发布时间：2018-08-04 18:38
【摘要】：草原行政处罚裁量基准的目的在于限制草原行政执法机关滥用行政处罚裁量权,以规范草原监督管理中的行政处罚行为,保护行政相对人的权益。本文从草原行政处罚裁量基准的基本原理和制定现状出发,对草原行政处罚裁量基准制定过程的相关问题进行研究。 本文第一部分界定了草原行政处罚裁量基准的概念,并将其定性为一种具有规则性质的行政自制规范,分析了其特点,进而阐述了其所具有的规制草原行政处罚裁量权、提高草原行政执法的效率、为草原行政主管机关及执法人员提供自我约束依据、为草原行政主管机关的行政处罚裁量行为提供可供说明的理由等基本功能。 本文第二部分在梳理了我国草原行政处罚裁量基准制定现状的基础上,从制定主体混乱、考量因素不完善、制定程序不规范三个方面,分析了草原行政处罚裁量基准制定过程中存在的问题。 本文第三部分分别针对草原行政处罚裁量基准制定过程中存在的具体问题,提出完善建议。首先,将草原行政处罚裁量基准的制定主体明确为省级草原行政主管机关,并剖析了市级、县级草原行政主管机关不能作为草原行政处罚裁量基准制定主体的原因；其次,将制定草原行政处罚裁量基准的考量因素区分为判断行为轻重的考量因素和决定具体量罚的考量因素,针对两类考量因素所存在的不同问题,提出不同的细化建议,试图健全制定草原行政处罚裁量基准的考量因素体系。最后,依据《规章制定程序条例》的规定,对草原行政处罚裁量基准的制定程序进行理论上的完善。
[Abstract]:The purpose of the administrative penalty discretion standard in grassland is to restrict the administrative law enforcement agencies from abusing the administrative penalty discretion in order to standardize the administrative punishment in the grassland supervision and management and to protect the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart. Based on the basic principle and current situation of administrative penalty discretion benchmark in grassland, this paper studies the relevant problems in the process of making administrative penalty discretion benchmark in grassland. The first part of this paper defines the concept of administrative penalty discretion benchmark of grassland, and characterizes it as a kind of administrative self-made norm with the nature of rules, analyzes its characteristics, and then expounds its discretion to regulate administrative punishment in grassland. To improve the efficiency of grassland administrative law enforcement, to provide self-restraint basis for grassland administrative authorities and law enforcement personnel, and to provide reasons for explaining administrative punishment discretion of grassland administrative authorities. In the second part of this paper, on the basis of combing the current situation of the establishment of the administrative penalty discretion benchmark in the grassland of our country, there are three aspects: confusion in the formulation of the main body, imperfect consideration factors, non-standard formulation procedure. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the process of formulating the discretion standard of grassland administrative penalty. In the third part of this paper, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve the administrative penalty of grassland. First of all, the main body of the grassland administrative penalty discretion standard is defined as the provincial grassland administrative authority, and analyzes the reasons why the municipal and county level grassland administrative authority can not be the main body of the grassland administrative penalty discretion benchmark; secondly, According to the different problems existing in the two kinds of factors, this paper puts forward different detailed suggestions, which can be divided into the factors of judging the severity of the behavior and the factors determining the specific penalty. This paper tries to perfect the consideration factor system of setting up the administrative penalty discretion standard of grassland. Finally, according to the regulations of the rules and regulations, this paper makes a theoretical improvement on the procedure of formulating the administrative penalty discretion standard of the grassland.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1
本文编号：2164764
[Abstract]:The purpose of the administrative penalty discretion standard in grassland is to restrict the administrative law enforcement agencies from abusing the administrative penalty discretion in order to standardize the administrative punishment in the grassland supervision and management and to protect the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart. Based on the basic principle and current situation of administrative penalty discretion benchmark in grassland, this paper studies the relevant problems in the process of making administrative penalty discretion benchmark in grassland. The first part of this paper defines the concept of administrative penalty discretion benchmark of grassland, and characterizes it as a kind of administrative self-made norm with the nature of rules, analyzes its characteristics, and then expounds its discretion to regulate administrative punishment in grassland. To improve the efficiency of grassland administrative law enforcement, to provide self-restraint basis for grassland administrative authorities and law enforcement personnel, and to provide reasons for explaining administrative punishment discretion of grassland administrative authorities. In the second part of this paper, on the basis of combing the current situation of the establishment of the administrative penalty discretion benchmark in the grassland of our country, there are three aspects: confusion in the formulation of the main body, imperfect consideration factors, non-standard formulation procedure. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the process of formulating the discretion standard of grassland administrative penalty. In the third part of this paper, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve the administrative penalty of grassland. First of all, the main body of the grassland administrative penalty discretion standard is defined as the provincial grassland administrative authority, and analyzes the reasons why the municipal and county level grassland administrative authority can not be the main body of the grassland administrative penalty discretion benchmark; secondly, According to the different problems existing in the two kinds of factors, this paper puts forward different detailed suggestions, which can be divided into the factors of judging the severity of the behavior and the factors determining the specific penalty. This paper tries to perfect the consideration factor system of setting up the administrative penalty discretion standard of grassland. Finally, according to the regulations of the rules and regulations, this paper makes a theoretical improvement on the procedure of formulating the administrative penalty discretion standard of the grassland.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 章志远;;行政裁量基准的兴起与现实课题[J];当代法学;2010年01期
2 王霁霞;;论裁量基准制度有效实施的条件[J];法学杂志;2010年02期
3 周佑勇;;裁量基准的制度定位——以行政自制为视角[J];法学家;2011年04期
4 戴建华;;裁量基准效力研究[J];法学评论;2012年02期
5 张勤景;;论西方国家行政裁量基准制度及启示[J];法制与社会;2011年08期
6 黄学贤;;行政裁量基准:理论、实践与出路[J];甘肃行政学院学报;2009年06期
7 周佑勇;熊樟林;;裁量基准制定权限的划分[J];法学杂志;2012年11期
8 关保英;;行政自由裁量基准质疑[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2013年03期
9 王传干;;行政裁量基准的技术范式研究[J];北方法学;2013年03期
10 朱芒;;日本《行政程序法》中的裁量基准制度——作为程序正当性保障装置的内在构成[J];华东政法学院学报;2006年01期
，本文编号：2164764
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2164764.html
