行政失权问题研究
发布时间：2018-08-12 15:28
【摘要】：行政失权，是指行政主体对相对人既有法律资格的限制或剥夺。其以相对人的权利能力为作用对象，而非通常意义上对具体权利的限制。权利能力的丧失，实质是法律人格的减损，由此形成一种法律上的“负身份”，意味着法律能力的减损、法律地位的下降。行政失权以行政确权、赋权为实施前提，强调在承认相对人原本享有权利能力的基础上对既有资格的剥夺，作用结果表现为使相对人“失其本所得”，由此处于一种不仅“不能与凡人齐”、且亦“不能与自身先前同”的不利状态。行政失权是行政主体组织和管理社会的有效手段。 权利能力的国家赋予性、公法人格的特殊性及个体正当行为的可期待性，为行政失权制度的存立提供了正当基础。尽管人性尊严与平等已成为现代立法普遍接受的理念，可生物学意义上的人与法律意义人的区分，向来是理解法律人格的前提。这种区分正鲜明揭示出人格从来都是由法律赋予的，权利能力制度乃是一项实在法上的人为设计结果。确切地说，权利能力是国家用以作用于社会成员的一种调控手段，权利能力的有无、多少，甚至特定情形下的具体化、类型化，均是国家意志的作用的结果。尤其在公法关系中，社会成员一方面因自然属性以人的资格参与法律关系，另一方面又因政治等社会属性以成员资格参与特殊关系；这种一般法律关系与特殊法律关系的区分主要通过一般权利能力与特殊权利能力的制度设计来体现。共同体可根据角色承担的要求不同，进行各种特殊权利能力的配置；同时，权利能力暗含着国家对个体正当行为的合理期待。从权利的成本观念及共同善的维系角度，国家在配置权利能力时均要求个体在享有权利能力的同时，也负担正当行为的责任。由此也构成通过行政失权对不当行为的个体剥夺其权利能力的正当性理由。 实践中，行政失权形式繁多。从失权的原因事由上看，有因法定客观条件成就而导致的自动失权，有因相对人主观意愿决定的主动失权，更为常见的是因相对人自身赋权条件缺失而导致的被动失权。行政失权的内容涉及公民能力、特定职业能力、特定行为资格等特殊权利能力，也包括某种程度上的一般权利能力。行政失权存在多层次的作用形式，既可能表现为对特殊赋权的撤回，使相对人丧失某类正身份，回复到一般法律主体的地位；也可能是对一般权利能力的限制，从而使相对人背负某类负身份。行政失权，在严格意义上是作为一种“类概念”被使用，基于失权原因事由不同、行政作用模式的差异，不同形式的失权行为法律性质并不完全相同。资格罚固然是行政失权最集中、最典型的表现形式，但实践中行政失权还可能体现为行政不利处分行为、行政确认行为、甚至作为其它法律行为附随后果而存在。 鉴于行政失权对相对人权益的重大影响，，有必要从立法形式、制度内容及实施程序等方面对失权制度进行系统规范。在立法形式上，应提高行政失权规范的法律位阶，强调对失权的设定权采取法律保留原则，明确只有法律和行政法规方得设定失权条款，且应严格规范各规范性文件中对失权的具体规定内容；在行政失权内容设置上，应充分保障人性尊严，并遵循比例原则，妥适地界定失权内容边界；在行政失权行为的实施环节，要全面系统构建正当程序，尤其要完善相对人申请听证程序、行政主体的告知及登记公示等环节，以有效防范行政权滥用，保障相对人权益。 从行政作用的系统性考虑，且也为更全面地保障相对人权益，行政失权还应有相配套的法律回复制度，使相对人被剥夺或限制的权利能力存在恢复的可能与保障。法律回复制度，包括对行政失权行为的法律救济，及对行政失权状态的法律消解两个层面。前者通过复议、诉讼等途径，撤销违法行政失权行为的效力，回复相对人被错误限制或剥夺的权利能力；后者则强调在行政失权行为合法存续的前提下，对失权状态的消解。行政失权法律回复的运作，与行政确认（许可）、行政失权一起，构成了行政权对相对人权利能力从“赋权”到“失权”再到“复权”的完整过程。
[Abstract]:The loss of administrative power refers to the restriction or deprivation of the legal qualifications of the counterpart by the administrative subject, whose object is the ability of the counterpart, not the restriction of the concrete rights in the ordinary sense. Administrative disempowerment is based on the premise of administrative confirmation and empowerment. It emphasizes the deprivation of existing qualifications on the basis of the recognition of the relative person's original ability to enjoy rights. The result is that the relative person "loses his original income", which is not only "not equal to the ordinary person", but also "can not be the same as himself before." The administrative loss of power is an effective means for the administrative body to organize and manage the society.
Although human dignity and equality have become generally accepted concepts in modern legislation, the distinction between man in biological sense and man in legal sense has always been an understanding of legal personality. This distinction clearly reveals that personality is always given by law, and the system of capacity for rights is the result of a man-made design in real law. It is the result of the will of the state. Especially in public law relations, social members take part in legal relations because of their natural attributes and human qualifications, and on the other hand, because of their political and other social attributes, they take part in special relations with membership. Communities can allocate different kinds of special rights and abilities according to the different requirements of their roles. At the same time, rights and abilities imply the reasonable expectations of the state for the proper behavior of individuals. From the perspective of the cost concept of rights and the maintenance of common good, the state requires the individual to enjoy the allocation of rights and abilities. At the same time, it also bears the responsibility of legitimate acts, which constitutes the legitimate reason for depriving the individual of the improper acts of his rights through administrative loss of power.
In practice, there are many forms of administrative loss of power. Seen from the reasons for the loss of power, there are automatic loss of power due to the achievement of statutory objective conditions, active loss of power due to the subjective will of the relative person, and more commonly, passive loss of power due to the lack of the relative person's own empowerment conditions. The special capacity for rights, such as professional ability, specific behavioral qualification and so on, also includes the general capacity for rights to a certain extent. Administrative disempowerment, in a strict sense, is used as a kind of "category concept". Due to different reasons for disempowerment, different modes of administrative action, different forms of disempowerment have different legal nature. Qualification penalty is the most concentrated and typical form of administrative disempowerment, but it is true. In practice, administrative loss of power may also be manifested as administrative unfavorable punishment, administrative confirmation, or even as a consequence of other legal acts.
In view of the great influence of administrative loss of power on the rights and interests of the counterpart, it is necessary to systematically regulate the system of administrative loss of power from the aspects of legislative form, system content and implementation procedure. The article of loss of power should be set up, and the specific provisions of loss of power should be strictly regulated in the normative documents; the content of loss of power should be set up to fully protect human dignity, and follow the principle of proportionality, properly define the boundary of loss of power content; in the implementation of administrative loss of power, we should build a comprehensive and systematic due process, especially perfect it. In order to effectively prevent the abuse of administrative power and protect the rights and interests of the counterpart, the procedure of applying for hearing by the counterpart, the notification of the administrative subject, and the publicity of registration and so on.
In view of the systematic consideration of the administrative function and the more comprehensive protection of the rights and interests of the counterpart, the system of legal replication of administrative loss of power should be matched so that the counterpart's ability to be deprived or restricted may be restored. The system of legal replication includes the legal remedies for administrative loss of power and the law on the state of administrative loss of power. The former revokes the validity of illegal administrative disempowerment by means of reconsideration and litigation, and restores the relative person's ability to be wrongly restricted or deprived; the latter emphasizes the dissolution of the state of disempowerment on the premise of the legal existence of administrative disempowerment; the operation of legal reply to administrative disempowerment, and administrative confirmation (permission). Together, administrative loss of power constitutes a complete process from "empowerment" to "loss of power" and then to "restoration of power" for the rights and abilities of the counterpart.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D912.1
本文编号：2179476
[Abstract]:The loss of administrative power refers to the restriction or deprivation of the legal qualifications of the counterpart by the administrative subject, whose object is the ability of the counterpart, not the restriction of the concrete rights in the ordinary sense. Administrative disempowerment is based on the premise of administrative confirmation and empowerment. It emphasizes the deprivation of existing qualifications on the basis of the recognition of the relative person's original ability to enjoy rights. The result is that the relative person "loses his original income", which is not only "not equal to the ordinary person", but also "can not be the same as himself before." The administrative loss of power is an effective means for the administrative body to organize and manage the society.
Although human dignity and equality have become generally accepted concepts in modern legislation, the distinction between man in biological sense and man in legal sense has always been an understanding of legal personality. This distinction clearly reveals that personality is always given by law, and the system of capacity for rights is the result of a man-made design in real law. It is the result of the will of the state. Especially in public law relations, social members take part in legal relations because of their natural attributes and human qualifications, and on the other hand, because of their political and other social attributes, they take part in special relations with membership. Communities can allocate different kinds of special rights and abilities according to the different requirements of their roles. At the same time, rights and abilities imply the reasonable expectations of the state for the proper behavior of individuals. From the perspective of the cost concept of rights and the maintenance of common good, the state requires the individual to enjoy the allocation of rights and abilities. At the same time, it also bears the responsibility of legitimate acts, which constitutes the legitimate reason for depriving the individual of the improper acts of his rights through administrative loss of power.
In practice, there are many forms of administrative loss of power. Seen from the reasons for the loss of power, there are automatic loss of power due to the achievement of statutory objective conditions, active loss of power due to the subjective will of the relative person, and more commonly, passive loss of power due to the lack of the relative person's own empowerment conditions. The special capacity for rights, such as professional ability, specific behavioral qualification and so on, also includes the general capacity for rights to a certain extent. Administrative disempowerment, in a strict sense, is used as a kind of "category concept". Due to different reasons for disempowerment, different modes of administrative action, different forms of disempowerment have different legal nature. Qualification penalty is the most concentrated and typical form of administrative disempowerment, but it is true. In practice, administrative loss of power may also be manifested as administrative unfavorable punishment, administrative confirmation, or even as a consequence of other legal acts.
In view of the great influence of administrative loss of power on the rights and interests of the counterpart, it is necessary to systematically regulate the system of administrative loss of power from the aspects of legislative form, system content and implementation procedure. The article of loss of power should be set up, and the specific provisions of loss of power should be strictly regulated in the normative documents; the content of loss of power should be set up to fully protect human dignity, and follow the principle of proportionality, properly define the boundary of loss of power content; in the implementation of administrative loss of power, we should build a comprehensive and systematic due process, especially perfect it. In order to effectively prevent the abuse of administrative power and protect the rights and interests of the counterpart, the procedure of applying for hearing by the counterpart, the notification of the administrative subject, and the publicity of registration and so on.
In view of the systematic consideration of the administrative function and the more comprehensive protection of the rights and interests of the counterpart, the system of legal replication of administrative loss of power should be matched so that the counterpart's ability to be deprived or restricted may be restored. The system of legal replication includes the legal remedies for administrative loss of power and the law on the state of administrative loss of power. The former revokes the validity of illegal administrative disempowerment by means of reconsideration and litigation, and restores the relative person's ability to be wrongly restricted or deprived; the latter emphasizes the dissolution of the state of disempowerment on the premise of the legal existence of administrative disempowerment; the operation of legal reply to administrative disempowerment, and administrative confirmation (permission). Together, administrative loss of power constitutes a complete process from "empowerment" to "loss of power" and then to "restoration of power" for the rights and abilities of the counterpart.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D912.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周清林;;中国语境中的“权利能力”[J];北大法律评论;2009年01期
2 徐国栋;;权利能力制度的理想与现实——人法的英特纳雄耐尔之路[J];北方法学;2007年02期
3 沈建峰;;权利能力概念的形成和变迁[J];北方法学;2011年03期
4 李永军;论权利能力的本质[J];比较法研究;2005年02期
5 徐国栋;寻找丢失的人格——从罗马、德国、拉丁法族国家、前苏联、俄罗斯到中国[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2004年06期
6 徐国栋;;从身份到理性——现代民法中的行为能力制度沿革考[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2006年04期
7 王立;中外法官权利能力和行为能力的比较分析——遴选优秀法官机制的法理基础比较解析[J];法律适用;2004年04期
8 胡玉鸿;;“人格”在当代法律上的意义[J];法商研究;2008年04期
9 张旭勇;;为我国行政事实行为救济制度辩护[J];法商研究;2012年02期
10 杨立新;论人格利益准共有[J];法学杂志;2004年06期
本文编号：2179476
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2179476.html
