论人工智能时代的机器人权利及其风险规制
发布时间：2018-10-10 16:21
【摘要】：机器人权利的产生是社会实力不断提升的结果。而权利发展史也证明,机器人权利主体地位符合权利发展的历史规律。作为一种社会活动的产物,机器人权利有别于人类的"自然权利",它具有法律拟制性、利他性以及功能性等权利属性。由此也形成了数据共享权、个体数据专有权、基于功能约束的自由权以及获得法律救济权四项基本权利类型。同时,机器人权利也对我国的法律体系提出了严峻的挑战,并引发了诸多新型权利纠纷。因此,在应对机器人权利所带来的社会风险上,我国应明确机器人权利的边界及法律保留事项、加强法律与机器人伦理规范的衔接、建立机器人监管机制,从而引领人机关系走向正常化、法治化。
[Abstract]:The generation of robot rights is the result of the continuous improvement of social strength. The history of the development of rights also proves that the status of robot rights subject accords with the historical law of the development of rights. As a product of social activities, robot rights are different from human's "natural rights". It has legal fictitious, altruistic and functional property. Thus, there are four basic types of rights: data sharing right, individual data exclusive right, right of freedom based on function constraint and right to obtain legal remedy. At the same time, robot rights also pose a severe challenge to the legal system of our country, and lead to many new rights disputes. Therefore, in dealing with the social risks brought about by robot rights, our country should make clear the boundary and legal reservation of robot rights, strengthen the connection between laws and robot ethical norms, and establish a robot supervision mechanism. Thus leading to the normalization of man-machine relations, the rule of law.
【基金】：广州大学新进“优秀青年博士”培养计划的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D912.1
，
本文编号：2262449
[Abstract]:The generation of robot rights is the result of the continuous improvement of social strength. The history of the development of rights also proves that the status of robot rights subject accords with the historical law of the development of rights. As a product of social activities, robot rights are different from human's "natural rights". It has legal fictitious, altruistic and functional property. Thus, there are four basic types of rights: data sharing right, individual data exclusive right, right of freedom based on function constraint and right to obtain legal remedy. At the same time, robot rights also pose a severe challenge to the legal system of our country, and lead to many new rights disputes. Therefore, in dealing with the social risks brought about by robot rights, our country should make clear the boundary and legal reservation of robot rights, strengthen the connection between laws and robot ethical norms, and establish a robot supervision mechanism. Thus leading to the normalization of man-machine relations, the rule of law.
【基金】：广州大学新进“优秀青年博士”培养计划的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D912.1
，
本文编号：2262449
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2262449.html
