动物园饲养动物损害责任的类型化与规则设计——以违反防止进入高度危险区域义务侵权责任为视角

发布时间：2018-03-19 00:02

本文选题：饲养动物　切入点：损害责任　出处：《求是学刊》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：动物园饲养动物损害责任的侵权责任构成规则与被侵权人过错抗辩事由规则应该被区分。动物园饲养动物损害责任仅适用于动物园设置了隔离措施的情形,在事实层面分为被侵权人是在隔离区之外还是之内被动物侵害两类,应当适用不同的规则。参观者在动物园隔离区之外被动物侵害的情形,动物园应当承担未尽管理职责侵权责任,适用无过错责任。动物园尽到管理职责是类似监护人责任的法定减责事由,以体现其公益性和开放性。参观者在动物园隔离区之内被动物侵害的情形,动物园应当承担未尽防止进入隔离区义务侵权责任,是一种违反防止进入高度危险区域义务的侵权责任,适用过错推定责任。
[Abstract]:The rules of the constitution of tort liability for animal breeding damage liability in zoos should be distinguished from the rules of fault defense of the infringers. The liability for animal damage in zoos is only applicable to cases where the zoo has set up isolation measures. At the de facto level, there are two categories of infringers who are infringed by animals outside or within the quarantine zone, and different rules should be applied. The zoo shall bear the tort liability for the failure to manage its duties, and shall be liable for no fault. The zoo shall fulfill its management duties as the legal reason for the reduction of liability similar to that of the guardian, In order to reflect its public welfare and openness, the zoo shall bear the liability for infringement of the obligation to prevent entry into the area of separation if the visitor is infringed by animals within the zoo's quarantine area, It is a kind of tort liability which violates the obligation to prevent entry into a highly dangerous area and is applicable to the presumption of fault.
【作者单位】：四川大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国侵权责任法改革研究”,项目编号:16JJD820015
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】