我国公益性事业单位培训模式研究
发布时间:2018-06-01 18:21
本文选题:公益性事业单位 + 培训 ; 参考:《吉林财经大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:事业单位是中国特有的组织名称,在世界的其他国家还没有相同称谓的组织,但从事业单位职能和定义方面是可以从西方国家找到与之相近似的组织。我国现阶段事业单位可分类为三类,即从事生产经营类、承担行政职能类和从事公益服务类。承担行政职能类将逐渐转变为行政机构;公益服务类,将即继续保持其组织类型,同时加强它的公益属性;生产经营类,将逐渐转变为企业性质单位。 随着中国社会经济的不断发展和国际接轨的进程不断加快,公共服务领域在一定程度上引入了市场机制,国家政府已经不再是惟一的公共服务和公共管理的主体机构,市场中的组织、非政府组织、公民都可以参与公共服务和公共管理体系,发生主体与公共领域多元化的现象。因为行政体制存在不同,在这样的原因下,公益性事业单位在行政管理体制上基本是趋同于国家政府机关的管理模式(包括财政管理、人员管理、培训管理等),同时我们可以清楚的了解到其内部管理方式和培训手段相对于国外较为落后,存在培训机制不够灵活的情况,存在总体人才队伍管理机制与人员素质相对偏低的问题。在我国,公益性事业单位是受国家法律或者国家政府所授权,其主要目的是助推中国公益事业的发展,其组织支出的费用则由国家财政或地方政府财政直接下拨款项、或采取定项补助、定额补助等形式。部分公益性事业单位会有一定的收入,但此类收入不会进行内部成员间的分配。 本文正是基于以上背景对公益性事业单位培训模式展开深入的研究,以公益性事业单位培训的相关理论为着手点,从公益性事业单位的概念、培训和模式的概念,以及公益性事业单位培训遇到的问题及解决方式为研究基础,,结合国外先进的培训经验,通过三大培训机构及对我国公益性事业单位培训模式进行较为深入的研究,同时对公益性事业单位培训模式中存在的不足进行相应的补充,对公益性事业单位培训模式进行较为深入的优化改进。
[Abstract]:Institution is a unique organization name in China, but it is similar to it in other countries in the world, but it can be found from western countries in terms of its function and definition. At present, institutions in China can be classified into three categories, that is, engaged in production and management, undertaking administrative functions and engaging in public welfare services. The category of administrative functions will be gradually transformed into administrative institutions; the category of public welfare services will continue to maintain its organizational type and at the same time strengthen its commonweal attribute; the category of production and management will gradually change into the nature of enterprises. With the continuous development of China's social economy and the accelerating process of international integration, the market mechanism has been introduced to a certain extent in the field of public service, and the national government is no longer the only public service and the main body of public administration. Organizations, NGOs and citizens in the market can participate in public service and public management system. Because the administrative system is different, for such reasons, public welfare institutions basically converge on the administrative management system of the national government organs (including financial management, personnel management, Training management and so on, at the same time, we can clearly understand that its internal management and training means are relatively backward compared with foreign countries, and there is a situation in which the training mechanism is not flexible enough. There is the problem that the management mechanism of the overall talent team and the quality of the personnel are relatively low. In our country, public welfare institutions are authorized by the state law or the state government. Their main purpose is to promote the development of public welfare undertakings in China, while the expenses of their organization expenditures are directly allocated by the state finance or local government finance. Or take the form of fixed item subsidy, quota subsidy and so on. Some public welfare institutions will have a certain income, but such income will not be allocated among the internal members. This paper is based on the above background of public welfare institutions training model in-depth research, with the relevant theory of public welfare institutions training as the starting point, from the concept of public welfare institutions, training and model concepts, As well as the problems encountered in the training of public welfare institutions and their solutions as the research basis, combined with the advanced training experience of foreign countries, through the three training institutions and the training mode of public welfare institutions in China, the training model of public welfare institutions in China is studied in depth. At the same time, the deficiencies in the training model of public welfare institutions are supplemented, and the training mode of public welfare institutions is optimized and improved.
【学位授予单位】:吉林财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D630.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈慧君;欧洲三国公务员培训一瞥[J];中国人才;2005年05期
2 马磊;;我国事业单位人力资源管理现存问题及对策分析[J];东方企业文化;2010年06期
3 吴芳;;事业单位人员培训存在的问题及对策分析[J];质量技术监督研究;2009年06期
4 朱兴旺;;法国公务员培训机制对人民检察院教育培训工作的启发[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2010年08期
5 刘岩;;英国公务员制度对我国的启示[J];管理工程师;2011年03期
6 黄大为;严灏;徐敏;;努力完善初任公务员培训机制[J];党政论坛;2010年04期
7 张琳;;中西方公务员制度的异同——以英国为例[J];科技创业月刊;2009年05期
8 贾婷;;浅析我国公共部门人力资源培训体系的构建[J];科教导刊(中旬刊);2010年09期
9 吕春霞;;浅谈如何加强事业单位人力资源管理[J];科技信息;2011年11期
10 刘军;;出国培训:培养年轻干部的一种好方式[J];领导科学;2007年05期
本文编号:1965180
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/gonggongguanlilunwen/1965180.html