当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 货币论文 >

我国证监会行政法律地位改革比较研究

发布时间:2018-08-24 17:39
【摘要】:在全球经济高度一体化的今天,证券市场作为大规模资金全球化流动的场所,对全球经济的繁荣稳定发挥着越来越大的作用。2008年由美国次贷危机引起的全球性金融风暴再次明确表明了证券监管的重要性。有鉴于此,随着全球经济的进一步发展,世界各主要国家日益认识到行政法制在证券监管活动中的重要作用,根据证券市场的新情况,不断适时调整本国的证券监管体制。 当今世界的证券监管模式大致可分为政府监管主导型和自律监管主导型两种。美国、英国、德国等作为西方主要资本主义国家,证券市场历史长、规模大,监管法律比较完备、制度比较严格,具有典型性。我国证券市场起步较晚,在上世纪90年代后期才基本建立起证券监管行政法制,,确立了以中国证监会为核心的覆盖全国的证券监管体系,之后仍然不断作出各种微调。中国证监会在设立之初的本意是成为独立监管的机构,但受限于我国的国情,中国证监会一直未能发挥出独立监管机构的优势,造成一系列的理论不协调和现实尴尬。 完善我国的证券监管体制,首先应从中国证监会入手,改革其行政法律地位是关键。只有明确中国证监会的行政法律地位,才能对该地位产生的职权进行规范,进而达到约束中国证监会、有效进行市场监管的最终目的。对中国证监会的法律地位和职能进行改造应从两个方面着手。一方面,应加强其独立的法律地位,防止行政机关对其施加过大的影响;另一方面,为适应中国证监会的独立监管地位,有必要对中国证监会的职权进行重新构造和完善。
[Abstract]:Today, when the global economy is highly integrated, the securities market is the place where the large-scale flow of capital flows. The global financial turmoil caused by the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis in 2008 clearly demonstrated the importance of securities regulation. In view of this, with the further development of the global economy, the major countries in the world are increasingly aware of the important role of the administrative legal system in the activities of securities supervision. According to the new situation of the securities market, they constantly adjust their securities regulatory system in a timely manner. The securities regulatory model in the world can be divided into two types: government supervision and self-regulation. As major western capitalist countries, the United States, Britain and Germany have a long history, a large scale, a relatively complete regulatory law, a relatively strict system, and are typical. The securities market of our country started relatively late in the late 1990s, it was only in the late 1990s that the administrative legal system of securities supervision was basically established, and the securities supervision system covering the whole country with CSRC as the core was established. After that, various fine adjustments were made continuously. China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) was originally set up to be an independent supervision institution, but limited by the national conditions of our country, CSRC has been unable to give play to the advantages of independent regulatory agencies, resulting in a series of theoretical disharmony and practical embarrassment. To perfect the securities supervision system of our country, we should start with CSRC, and reform its administrative legal status is the key. Only by making clear the administrative legal status of CSRC, can the authority of CSRC be standardized, and the ultimate purpose of restricting CSRC and effectively carrying out market supervision can be achieved. The legal status and function of CSRC should be reformed from two aspects. On the one hand, we should strengthen its independent legal status and prevent the administrative organs from exerting too much influence on it; on the other hand, in order to adapt to the independent supervisory status of CSRC, it is necessary to reconstruct and perfect the functions and powers of CSRC.
【学位授予单位】:上海社会科学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D922.1;F832.51

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 柯湘;;中国证监会行政处罚机制研究[J];商业研究;2011年08期

2 刘焕省;;欧盟金融工具市场指令对网络时代证券中介的监管[J];重庆工学院学报(社会科学版);2009年07期

3 曲少臣;;法律授权的组织的经济法地位——兼评中国证监会的地位[J];太原师范学院学报(社会科学版);2008年05期

4 王建文;;中国证监会的主体属性与职能定位:解读与反思[J];法学杂志;2009年12期

5 罗培新;;美国新自由主义金融监管路径失败的背后——以美国证券监管失利的法律与政治成因分析为视角[J];法学评论;2011年02期

6 孙持明;;从1933年美国证券法看证券市场的自治与监管[J];法制与社会;2007年05期

7 徐冬根;刘丽娟;;金融危机与美国证券监管体制改革[J];法治研究;2010年04期

8 张晓凌;陈华敏;;美国证券法对衍生交易市场风险披露的监管及借鉴——以SEC“305规则”体制的监管要求为视角[J];国际金融研究;2006年10期

9 王夏敏;;论德国证券期货监管体系[J];高科技与产业化;2006年07期

10 谢凌霞;;美国证券交易委员会执法体制对我国证券监管的启示[J];广西金融研究;2008年11期



本文编号:2201552

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/huobilw/2201552.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e99fe***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com