面对面和计算机群体决策在观点产生上的比较

发布时间：2018-05-01 03:14

本文选题：观点产生 + 面对面群体　；参考：《心理学报》2003年04期

【摘要】：以 14 4名被试组成 32个群体 ,通过实验室模拟实验 ,对群体规模、群体类型和交流方式等 3个变量在观点产生的数量和质量等指标上进行了比较。结果表明 :(1)在所有实验条件下 ,CM (以计算机为中介的 )决策群体都比FTF(面对面的 )决策群体产生了更多数量的有效观点 ;CM名义群体比FTF名义群体产生了更多数量的有效观点。有效观点和创新观点产生的数量 ,主要受产生式障碍和评价恐惧的影响。 (2 )交流方式影响群体创新观点的数量 ,但对观点产生的深度和广度没有影响。群体规模和群体类型影响观点产生的深度和广度。名义群体比互动群体产生范围更广的观点。一般来说 ,名义群体比互动群体产生的观点深度高。匿名性和平行沟通是促进群体成员产生大量创新观点的主要原因。 (3)相对于传统的FTF头脑风暴法 ,运用电子头脑风暴法的群体成员对自己或群体所产生的观点用于解决实际问题的信心不足。
[Abstract]:A total of 144 subjects were selected to form 32 populations. Through laboratory simulation experiments, three variables, such as group size, group type and communication mode, were compared in terms of quantity and quality of opinion. The results show that under all the experimental conditions, the CM (computer mediated) decision-making group produces more effective opinions than the FTF (face to face) decision group. The CM nominal group produces more than the FTF nominal group. A larger number of valid points of view. The number of effective and innovative ideas generated is mainly influenced by generative barriers and fear of evaluation. 2) the mode of communication affects the number of group innovative views, but has no effect on the depth and breadth of the views. Group size and group type influence the depth and breadth of the viewpoint. Nominal groups produce a wider range of views than interactive groups. Generally speaking, nominal groups produce deeper views than interactive groups. Anonymity and parallel communication are the main reasons to promote group members to produce a large number of innovative ideas. Compared with the traditional FTF brainstorming method, the group members who use the electronic brainstorming method do not have enough confidence in themselves or the ideas produced by the group to solve the practical problems.
【作者单位】：浙江大学心理学系东华大学工商管理学院
【基金】：国家自然科学基金 (基金号 70 1710 3 1)资助
【分类号】：C934

【相似文献】