外国直接投资对地区腐败水平的影响——来自中国的经验

发布时间：2018-04-12 08:25

本文选题：外国直接投资 + 地区腐败　；参考：《国际经济合作》2017年05期

【摘要】：基于1995-2013年中国29个省区的数据,本文从地区差异、时期差异和外资来源地差异三个视角,实证检验了FDI对地区腐败影响的三个理论假说。研究表明,FDI对腐败的影响存在地区差异,FDI的进入抑制了东部地区腐败问题,对中西部地区腐败问题的抑制作用则不明显。FDI对地区腐败的影响存在显著时期差异,1995-2002年,FDI进入对地区腐败的影响方向并不确定;而在2003-2013年,FDI显著地抑制了地区腐败问题。不同来源地FDI对地区腐败的影响也存在显著差异,港澳台来源的FDI对地区腐败的改善作用并不明显,其他来源地FDI则有效地缓解了地区腐败问题。
[Abstract]:1995-2013 years China 29 provinces based on the data from the three perspectives of regional differences, time differences and foreign sources of differences, empirical test of the three hypothesis the effect of FDI on the area of corruption. The results show that there are regional differences in the effect of FDI on corruption, FDI into the suppression of corruption in the eastern region, there are significant period of time difference, the inhibition effect on the issue of corruption in the Midwest is not obvious to the.FDI area of corruption 1995-2002 years, FDI entered the impact on regional corruption does not determine the direction; and in the 2003-2013 year, FDI significantly inhibited corruption area. Effects of different sources of FDI in the area of corruption is the existence of significant differences, improve effect of FDI on the source of Hong Kong and Macao area of corruption is not obvious, other sources of FDI alleviates the problem of corruption.

【作者单位】：河南财经政法大学国际经济与贸易学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“反腐败与地方政府环境治理提升研究”(15CGL042)的阶段性成果河南省高校社科创新团队(2013-CXTD-07) 河南省高校社科重大攻关项目(2013-ZG-008) 河南省优势特色学科的支持
【分类号】：D630.9;F832.6

【相似文献】