街道办事处改革的路径选择

发布时间：2018-07-01 12:54

本文选题：街道办事处 + 行政生态学　；参考：《华北电力大学(北京)》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：全社会兴起的社会管理创新的背景,伴随着基层事务的增多,城市发展与传统管理体制之间矛盾、当前街道管理体制的弊端日益明显。无论是基于现实需要还是政府作用,在有形或无形中,街道办事处承担了越来越多的政府职能,而自身又难以协调,出现权能失衡、条块关系混乱、运行机制不畅等问题,阻碍了城市管理科学化的发展和社区自治。街道办事处正是处在了改革的十字路口。理论界对此有着广泛而深入的讨论,最终还是无法得出定论。自20世纪90年代以来,民政部推动社区建设工作,各地相继进行试点工作,从而引发了关于街道办事处的改革,改革试点工作在不断推进。目前,我国街道办事处改革尚处于探索试点阶段,国家层面上还没有推而广之的改革方法和模板,更多的是地方根据实际“摸石过河”。从当前的改革实践情况来看,街道办事处改革基本形成了两种改革方向:一是自治导向的街道办事处改革;二是行政导向的街道办事处改革。文中运用里格斯的行政生态学理论,结合我国街道办事处改革具体情况,综合考虑理论与现实选取了经济要素、政治要素、社会要素以及地域规模等要素,对比分析行政生态因素对这些改革案例的影响,比较了不同改革方向的街道办事处改革案例,分析了行政生态因素对街道办事处改革路径的影响。经过分析之后发现,行政化导向的街道办事处改革不适合当前我国街道办事处改革的方向,长期行政力量过强干预社区,最终会阻碍社区自治。当前,我国的政治环境要素、社会环境要素在不断的发展和提高,社会生态环境逐渐改善、政治民主化程度也在不断提高、公民参与意识逐渐加强,这些都为自治化导向的街道办事处改革提供了基础。不同地区的具体改革方式还需要根据实际情况来确定。因此,在今后的改革中提出一些建议,为街道办事处改革提供理论思路,对改善城市基层管理有一定的实践意义。
[Abstract]:The background of the social management innovation rising in the whole society, with the increase of grass-roots affairs, the contradiction between the urban development and the traditional management system, the malpractice of the current street management system is becoming increasingly obvious. Whether based on the actual needs or the role of the government, in the tangible or invisible, the sub-district office has assumed more and more government functions, but it is difficult to coordinate itself, there are problems such as the imbalance of power and power, the disorder of the relationship between bars and pieces, the unobstructed operation mechanism, and so on. It hinders the scientific development of urban management and community autonomy. The street offices are at the crossroads of reform. Theorists have a wide and in-depth discussion of this, but finally can not draw a conclusion. Since the 1990s, the Ministry of Civil Affairs has promoted the work of community construction, and various localities have carried out the pilot work one after another, which has led to the reform of the sub-district offices, and the reform of the pilot work has been carried out continuously. At present, the reform of subdistrict office in our country is still in the stage of exploration and pilot, and there is no widely used reform method and template at the national level, and more local people "touch the stone and cross the river" according to the actual situation. From the current reform practice, there are two kinds of reform directions: one is the self-directed reform of the sub-district office, the other is the administrative oriented reform of the sub-district office. Based on Riggs' theory of administrative ecology and the concrete situation of the reform of the sub-district office in our country, the paper selects the factors of economy, politics, society and regional scale. This paper compares the influence of administrative ecological factors on these reform cases, compares the reform cases of sub-district offices with different reform directions, and analyzes the influence of administrative ecological factors on the reform path of street offices. After analysis, it is found that the administrative orientation of the reform of street offices is not suitable for the current reform of the sub-district offices in our country, and that the long-term strong administrative power will interfere with the community, which will eventually hinder the community autonomy. At present, the elements of political environment and social environment in our country are constantly developing and improving, the social ecological environment is gradually improving, the degree of political democratization is also increasing, and the consciousness of citizen participation is gradually strengthened. All of these provide the basis for self-governing-oriented reform of subdistrict offices. The specific reform methods in different regions also need to be determined according to the actual situation. Therefore, some suggestions are put forward in the future reform to provide theoretical ideas for the reform of sub-district offices, which has certain practical significance for improving urban grass-roots management.
【学位授予单位】：华北电力大学(北京)
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D630

【参考文献】