治理错位与冲突升级:复合治理的困境——“东利事件”的个案研究
发布时间：2018-07-26 06:38
【摘要】：文章采用案例研究法,以20世纪90年代初发生的"东利事件"为例,透过该教派冲突事件的冲突升级及解决过程,重点探讨了不同治理主体及治理机制参与下的复合型冲突治理如何陷入结构性错位困境这一核心问题。文章通过历时性案例分析发现,东利事件不仅经历了从日常冲突到刑事案件,再到群体性武装械斗甚至地方骚乱的冲突类型转换,还呈现出由个体性非暴力冲突到局部性暴力冲突,再到群体性及全局性暴力冲突的冲突等级变化,实际上也分别适用不同类型的冲突解决框架。然而,与宗教的复合性治域属性相对应,由宗教组织、不同层级政府、社区自治组织等主体所共同参与的复合型冲突治理,却面临双重结构性错位的现实困境——横向和纵向结构性治理错位,进而使得内外、正式与非正式治理机制失效,甚至反向激化事态。
[Abstract]:Taking the "Dongli incident" that occurred in the early 1990s as an example, this paper adopts the case study method, through the conflict escalation and resolution process of the sectarian conflict. This paper mainly discusses how the complex conflict governance with the participation of different governance bodies and governance mechanisms falls into the dilemma of structural dislocation. Through the analysis of diachronic cases, it is found that the Dongli incident not only experienced a transition from the daily conflict to the criminal case, but also to the group armed fighting and even the local riots. It also shows the change of conflict level from individual non-violent conflict to local violent conflict and then to group and global violent conflict. In fact, different conflict resolution frameworks are applied respectively. However, corresponding to the complex dominion attribute of religion, it is governed by the complex conflict which is jointly participated by religious organizations, different levels of government, community autonomous organizations, etc. However, it is faced with the practical dilemma of dual structural dislocation-horizontal and vertical structural governance dislocation, which makes the internal and external, formal and informal governance mechanism ineffective, and even reverse aggravation of the situation.
【作者单位】： 中央民族大学民族学与社会学学院;
【基金】：北京市哲学社科规划项目“技术进步与组织间关系”(12SHC021) 中央民族大学优秀青年人才科研专项“民族社会工作的服务需求及介入策略研究”(2017YQ11)
【分类号】：D631.43;D635
，
本文编号：2145175
[Abstract]:Taking the "Dongli incident" that occurred in the early 1990s as an example, this paper adopts the case study method, through the conflict escalation and resolution process of the sectarian conflict. This paper mainly discusses how the complex conflict governance with the participation of different governance bodies and governance mechanisms falls into the dilemma of structural dislocation. Through the analysis of diachronic cases, it is found that the Dongli incident not only experienced a transition from the daily conflict to the criminal case, but also to the group armed fighting and even the local riots. It also shows the change of conflict level from individual non-violent conflict to local violent conflict and then to group and global violent conflict. In fact, different conflict resolution frameworks are applied respectively. However, corresponding to the complex dominion attribute of religion, it is governed by the complex conflict which is jointly participated by religious organizations, different levels of government, community autonomous organizations, etc. However, it is faced with the practical dilemma of dual structural dislocation-horizontal and vertical structural governance dislocation, which makes the internal and external, formal and informal governance mechanism ineffective, and even reverse aggravation of the situation.
【作者单位】： 中央民族大学民族学与社会学学院;
【基金】：北京市哲学社科规划项目“技术进步与组织间关系”(12SHC021) 中央民族大学优秀青年人才科研专项“民族社会工作的服务需求及介入策略研究”(2017YQ11)
【分类号】：D631.43;D635
，
本文编号：2145175
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2145175.html
