周秦汉文学研究中的《汉志》主义及其超越

发布时间：2018-01-13 05:02

本文关键词：周秦汉文学研究中的《汉志》主义及其超越　出处：《文学遗产》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：未央宫所藏西汉成帝之前的古文献,经过刘向校书在文本形态上发生巨变,谓之文本革命或不为过。这批古书又多是今传本之源,故此次文本变迁意义重大。简言之,经过刘向校书,那些原本开放性的文本被校雠写定为闭合性文本,那些以"类"的形式存在的流动的篇章变成了一部部固定形态的古书。《汉书·艺文志》记录的就是被刘向整理后的一部部被划归入固定学术系谱的图书,它实质上是刘向图书整理成果目录,而非皇家藏书目录或西汉文献基本目录。《汉志》及其文献图谱应如何认知,又如何以其为基础超越于它,展开一种新的问题方式,乃本文着力之处。
[Abstract]:The ancient documents before Emperor Chengdi of the Western Han Dynasty in Weiyang Palace, after the great changes in the form of the texts of Liu Xiangxiao, called the text revolution or not too much. These ancient books are the source of this biography. Therefore, this text change is of great significance. In short, after Liu Xiangjiao's book, the original open text was written as closed text. Those flowing chapters in the form of "class" have become an ancient book in a fixed form. The book "Han Shu 路Art Chronicles" records a book classified as a fixed academic pedigree by Liu Xiang. It is actually a catalogue of Liu Xiang's books, not a royal catalogue or a basic catalogue of documents in the Western Han Dynasty. "Han Zhi" and its literature atlas should be recognized, and how to transcend it on the basis of them. Developing a new way of problem is the focus of this paper.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学文学院;
【分类号】：I206.2
【正文快照】： 引言近几十年来,随着简帛文献的大量面世,似乎早期文本的书写、流传、成书等问题已然得到比较满意的解答了。问题真是如此吗?新出材料的价值如何判定?当然不是依托于它们自身,而是与之相关的系统的传世文献。如果我们对传世文献的认识存在问题,对新出文献价值的判断就难免有误

【相似文献】