论郭茂倩新乐府涵义、范围及入乐问题

发布时间：2018-01-28 02:31

本文关键词： 新乐府涵义边界入乐　出处：《文学遗产》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：长期以来,学人对郭茂倩新乐府定义多有误解和不解:或认为新乐府不入乐,不是乐府,或主张扩大新乐府范围,或主张缩小新乐府范围。文章重新解读了郭茂倩新乐府辞定义,指出"唐世之新歌",意为唐代乐府新歌辞,名称来自《乐府新歌》等歌录;"辞实乐府",是说其乐府性质确切无疑;"未常被于声",意为不经常表演,而非从不表演;新乐府音乐形态有旧声新辞、新声新辞、无声新辞三种情况,并非都不入乐;主张取消新乐府,或扩大、缩小新乐府辞边界,皆因误解或不解郭茂倩新乐府定义。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the scholar has many misunderstandings and puzzles about Guo Maoqian's definition of the new Yuefu: either he thinks that the new Yuefu is not happy, is not Yuefu, or advocates expanding the scope of the new Yuefu. The article reinterprets Guo Maoqian's definition of New Music House, and points out that "the New Song of Tang Dynasty" means the new song of Yuefu in the Tang Dynasty, the name of which comes from "Yuefu New Song" and so on. "Cishi Yuefu" is to say that the nature of Yuefu is certain; "not always being heard" means not often acting, not never performing; There are three kinds of situations in the music form of New Music House: old sound, new speech, new sound and new speech, not all of them are not without music. To abolish or expand the new Yuefu and narrow the boundary of New Yuefu are all because of misunderstanding or misunderstanding Guo Maoqian's definition of New Yuefu.
【作者单位】：广州大学人文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“《乐府诗集》整理与补编”(项目编号13&ZD110)阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：I207.22
【正文快照】： 新乐府在诗歌史上具有重要地位,但新乐府涵义一直存在争议,有人甚至认为新乐府不是乐府,主张从乐府诗中剔除。其实郭茂倩《乐府诗集·新乐府辞叙论》给新乐府下了明确定义:“新乐府者,皆唐世之新歌也。以其辞实乐府,而未常被于声,故曰新乐府也。”(1)但学人对这一定义或是误解

【相似文献】