论小说观念形成初期在子史间的错位与游移

发布时间：2018-01-28 22:18

  本文关键词： 小说 经史未分 经史分立 《汉书·艺文志》 《七录》　出处：《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：班固编撰《汉书·艺文志》时,各种史籍依附于经学,史学体系尚未独立分类,致使在形成初期更贴近于古史特征的小说,只能著录于诸子之末。阮孝绪编撰《七录》时,新型的史学体系已经相对完善并独立成类,但小说的发展却逐渐偏离了新型史学体系的特征,致使小说的类别此后一直停留在子部的范畴内。
[Abstract]:When Ban Gu compiled the book of Han Dynasty, all kinds of historical books were attached to the Confucian classics, and the historical system had not yet been classified independently, which resulted in the novels which were closer to the characteristics of ancient history in the early stage of their formation. When Ruan Xiaoxu compiled "Seven Records", the new historical system has been relatively perfect and independent into categories, but the development of the novel gradually deviated from the characteristics of the new historical system. As a result, the category of the novel has remained in the category of sub-part since then.
【作者单位】： 合肥工业大学文法学院;安徽大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“中国古体小说观念流变研究”(15BZW070) 合肥工业大学哲学社会科学培育计划项目“中国古代说话源流研究”(JS2016HGXJ0012)之阶段性成果
【分类号】：I207.4
【正文快照】： 中国小说在起源之初,性质驳杂,迷障层叠,历代的研究者各自讲说,观点不一。如汉代桓谭《新论》即与《汉书·艺文志》所论不同,唐代史学家刘知^~《史论》所述亦与唐人主流小说观点不同,宋代欧阳修、郑樵、明代胡应麟、清代纪昀所述皆各有差异。及至鲁迅撰《中国小说史略》,亦无，

本文编号：1471701