始进终退:再论近代地方士人与“国”的关系变迁——以刘绍宽《厚庄日记》为个案

发布时间：2018-02-22 18:23

本文关键词： 刘绍宽《厚庄日记》国家乡里地方士人　出处：《史林》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文以清季民国浙江省平阳县士人刘绍宽所作的《厚庄日记》为主体资料,对其经历与观念所反映的近代"乡"与"国"之关联的变迁,做一相对长程的梳理分析。概言之,借助轮船海运、近代报刊等要素,地方士人即便未曾长期脱离乡里,亦可产生"国"与自身、与地方命运关联空前紧密的认识,并在乡以地方变革应对国族危机。而另一面,中土原有的学术文教,亦被其视为"国"之所以继续为"国"的主要因由,和"乡"与"国"之间起码的精神关联所在。由此形成"始进终退"的关系变迁轨迹:民国代清后,此前趋新预流的地方士人对于危及本土之"学"或"教"的国家建设,已纷纷转入消极。"地方"在近代趋向"国家"的"统合"进程,终却可能吊诡地加剧了一国以内知识思想版图与社会的"分裂",促使形成了新旧更加分明、明暗更为不一的多个"世界"。
[Abstract]:Taking Liu Shaoguan, a scholar in Pingyang County, Zhejiang Province during the Qing Dynasty and Republic of China, as the main material, this paper makes a relatively long period of analysis on the changes of the relationship between "Xiang" and "country" reflected by his experiences and ideas. With the help of shipping by ship and modern newspapers and periodicals, the local scholars, even if they had not left the countryside for a long time, could have an unprecedented understanding of the "country" and themselves, and the unprecedented connection with the local destiny, and in the village they would respond to the national crisis with local changes. On the other hand, The original academic culture and education in China and Turkey were also regarded as the main reason why the "state" continued to be the "state", and where the basic spiritual connection between "township" and "country" lay. The relationship between "advance, advance, and retreat" was thus formed: after the Qing Dynasty of the Republic of China, The local scholars, who had been in a new trend, have turned to the negative for the construction of the country which endangers the local "learning" or "teaching". The "integration" of the "local" towards the "state" in recent times has become a negative one. In the end, however, it may paradoxically aggravate the "division" between the territory of knowledge and the society within a country, and promote the formation of many "worlds" which are more distinct between the old and the new and more varied in light and shade.
【作者单位】：上海社会科学院历史研究所;
【分类号】：I207.65;K252

【相似文献】