上博简《孔子诗论》“大雅”论残简阙文臆补与相关诗学问题

发布时间：2018-02-26 12:40

本文关键词： 《孔子诗论》 “大雅”论阙文“臆补” 诗学史问题　出处：《中国人民大学学报》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：上博简《孔子诗论》"大雅"论简残严重,学界皆略而不论。根据对残简阙文性质的推测,所缺简文文字当为"《大雅》盛德也,多言[周],□□□□□□□□□□""[孔子]曰:诗其犹平门""[有怨王者何如?曰:《大雅》]是也"。简文的诗学意义在于,"盛德"论揭示出"大雅"文本内容实质是对周民族革故鼎新、除旧布新之维新精神的歌颂;"多言[周]""[有怨王者]"概括了"大雅"正反两方面内容性质;"□□□□□□□□□□"启示发现《诗经》四大门类的诗乐分家不同步,孔子时代"大雅"、"小雅"、"邦风"诗乐已分家,而尊贵的"颂"类还一直坚守着乐歌诗三位一体的最后领地。简文还透出另一信息:诗乐分家后,"大雅""小雅""邦风"仍可能保留着"徒歌"《诗》之文本的遗风。
[Abstract]:Shang Bo bamboo slips < Confucius' Poems > > "Da Ya" theory of simple and elegant is seriously disabled, but the academic circles do not care about it. According to the speculation about the nature of the missing text, the missing text should be "Da Ya > Sheng de", More words [weeks]---"[Confucius] said: poetry is still flat door" "there is a resentful king He Ru?" The poetic significance of the simple text lies in the fact that the theory of "Sheng de" reveals that the essence of the text of "Da Ya" is to revolutionize the Zhou nationality. Extolling the spirit of the reform of the old and the new; "more words [weeks]" "[the resentful king]" summed up the nature of the "great elegance" in both positive and negative aspects; "---" revelation found that the separation of poetry and music among the four major categories of the Book of songs was not in step with each other. In the time of Confucius, "great elegance", "small elegance", "state style" and poetry and music had been separated. However, the noble "Ode" has always adhered to the final territory of the Trinity of Song Poetry. The short text also reveals another message: after the separation of poetry and music, "Da Ya" and "Xiao Ya" and "State style" may still retain the remains of the text of "Apostle" and "Poems".
【作者单位】：中国人民大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“先秦出土文献及佚文献文学综合研究”(15AZW004) 北京市社会科学基金重大项目“宋前出土文献及佚文献文学研究”(15ZDA13)
【分类号】：I207.22;K877.5

【相似文献】