对明末杂剧《破梦鹃》的不同解读——与《古杂剧〈破梦鹃〉初探》作者商榷

发布时间：2018-02-28 23:19

本文关键词： 徐芳李雯太和记破梦鹃四声猿　出处：《文化遗产》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：明末李雯《破梦鹃》杂剧未刊稿的发现,引起治戏曲史学者的重视。徐立《古杂剧〈破梦鹃〉初探》一文,对该剧撰者李雯、序作者徐芳等未加以考订,对近人题跋中的某些失误,也未予以辨析订正,就轻易将所谓杨慎的《太和记》,当成最早的川剧作品,"这以后就出现了一个断档","《破梦鹃》杂剧的发现,为我们弥补了这个断档的缺陷"。本文则认为《太和记》非杨慎所撰,而是明代许潮的杂剧作品;李雯根本就不是四川文士,而是明末清初江西南城县的戏曲作家。明代川籍作家的剧作,与川剧是两个概念,不可混为一谈。
[Abstract]:The discovery of the unpublished draft of Li Wen's "broken Dream cuckoo" at the end of the Ming Dynasty has aroused the attention of scholars in the history of Chinese opera. Xu Li's essay on the Ancient Zaju "A preliminary study of the broken Dream of the cuckoo" has not been examined by the author, Xu Fang and the author of the play, Li Wen, the author of the preface, etc. Without discriminating and revising some mistakes in the postscript of modern people, it is easy to regard Yang Shen's "Taihe Ji" as the earliest Sichuan opera work. "after this, there will be a broken file", "the discovery of the" broken Dream cuckoo "zaju. This article argues that Taihe Ji was not written by Yang Shen, but a zaju by Xu Chao in the Ming Dynasty, and Li Wen is not a Sichuan scholar at all. It is the opera writer in Nancheng County of Jiangxi Province in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties. The dramas of Sichuan writers in Ming Dynasty and Sichuan Opera are two concepts and cannot be confused.
【作者单位】：北京语言大学人文学院;
【分类号】：I207.37

【相似文献】