魏晋南北朝的文学发展论与刘勰“通变”观的局限

发布时间：2018-05-11 10:04

本文选题：魏晋南北朝 + 文学发展　；参考：《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：魏晋南北朝的文学发展论有复古和新变两种倾向。挚虞、裴子野、刘勰等人从宗经思想出发,继承了先秦两汉对社会政治与文学关系的认识,代表了一种复古倒退的文学发展观。刘勰在继承传统的同时,过度强调了帝王的文艺政策对文学发展的影响,他的可贵之处是注意到了文化、文学内部各种因素对文学发展的影响。萧统、沈约、萧子显、萧纲、萧绎等人则代表了进化新变的文学发展观。刘勰所谓"通变"有共时性和历时性两种意义,只有在历时性的意义上,"通变"才与文学发展有关。在文学发展观上,刘勰没有做到"折中";能够"折中"地揭示出文学发展历史内涵的,是新变派的沈约。
[Abstract]:The literary development theory of Wei, Jin and Southern and Northern dynasties has two tendencies: to restore the ancient times and to change the new. Dai Yu, Pei Ziye, Liu Xie and others inherited the understanding of the relationship between social politics and literature in the pre-Qin and Han dynasties, and represented a retrogressive view of literary development. While inheriting the tradition, Liu Xie overemphasized the influence of the emperor's literary policy on the development of literature. His valuable point was that he paid attention to the influence of culture and various factors within literature on the development of literature. Xiao Tong, Shen Yue, Xiao Zixian, Xiao Gang and Xiao Yi represent the new evolution of literary development. Liu Xie's so-called "Tongchang" has two meanings: synchronic and diachronic. Only in the diachronic sense, is it related to the development of literature. In the view of literary development, Liu Xie failed to make a "compromise", and it was Shen Yue who could reveal the historical connotation of literary development in a "compromise" way.
【作者单位】：山东社会科学院文化研究所;
【基金】：山东社会科学院创新工程重大支撑项目“中国文化学导论”
【分类号】：I206.2

【相似文献】