对外汉语教材中拒绝言语行为的语用评估
发布时间：2018-08-23 15:04
【摘要】：目前作为对外汉语教学基础的教材往往缺乏真实性,导致学习者交际失败。通过教材评估,可以指出其中所存的问题,以提高教材质量。鉴于这种情况,本文以《长城汉语·生存交际》、《汉语听说教程》和《新实用汉语课本》三套对外汉语教材中的拒绝言语行为作为研究对象,探讨并评估其语用的真实性及设计的科学性。 论文主要分为三个部分：在第一部分,在拒绝言语行为研究基础上,我们对每种引发句(请求、邀请、提供以及建议)以及对每种关系(陌生、一般、好友、家人)总结出了典型的汉语拒绝语言行为策略组合以及语言手段(词汇,句式)。在第二部分,我们对三套对外汉语教材中的拒绝言语行为进行了统计分析,通过其中所出现的拒绝策略与汉语拒绝研究结果的对比,讨论教材中与实际交际中出现的拒绝言语行为的不同。同时也调查教材所涉及到的拒绝场景,拒绝手段以及表达拒绝言语行为的练习设计。本文指出,虽然三套教材中的拒绝言语行为大部分都符合汉语母语者的语用习惯,但是在这个领域上教材还是有所不足,如在每种场景出现的拒绝比例失调,关键拒绝策略的缺少,特定场景设计的缺乏等等。最后,根据所获得的结果,我们指出一些对建材编写的建议。 通过此项研究我们希望使教材编者注意到教材中存在的问题,从而提供一些对于设计拒绝言语行为的对话、练习的启示与指导。
[Abstract]:At present, teaching materials as the basis of teaching Chinese as a foreign language often lack authenticity, resulting in learners' communication failure. Through the evaluation of teaching materials, we can point out the existing problems in order to improve the quality of teaching materials. In view of this situation, this paper focuses on the refusal speech acts in three sets of textbooks, such as "the Great Wall Chinese Survival Communication", "Chinese listening and speaking course" and "New practical Chinese textbook". To explore and evaluate the authenticity of its pragmatics and the scientific nature of its design. The thesis is divided into three parts: in the first part, on the basis of the study of refusal speech act, we give each kind of triggered sentence (request, invitation, offer and suggestion), as well as every relationship (strange, general, good friend). Family members summarize the typical combination of Chinese refusal strategies and language devices (vocabulary, sentence structure). In the second part, we make a statistical analysis of the refusal speech acts in three sets of textbooks for TCFL, and compare the rejection strategies with the results of the Chinese refusal study. Discusses the differences between the refusal speech act in the textbook and the actual communication. At the same time, the text also investigated the rejection scenarios, refusal methods and practice design for expressing refusal speech acts. This paper points out that although most of the refusal speech acts in the three sets of textbooks conform to the pragmatic habits of Chinese native speakers, there are still some deficiencies in the textbooks in this field, such as the imbalance of rejection ratio in each scenario. Lack of key rejection strategies, lack of design of specific scenarios, etc. Finally, according to the results obtained, we point out some suggestions for building materials. Through this study, we hope to draw the textbook editors' attention to the problems existing in the textbook, thus providing some enlightenment and guidance for the dialogue and practice in the design of refusal speech acts.
【学位授予单位】：北京外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：H195.3
本文编号：2199429
[Abstract]:At present, teaching materials as the basis of teaching Chinese as a foreign language often lack authenticity, resulting in learners' communication failure. Through the evaluation of teaching materials, we can point out the existing problems in order to improve the quality of teaching materials. In view of this situation, this paper focuses on the refusal speech acts in three sets of textbooks, such as "the Great Wall Chinese Survival Communication", "Chinese listening and speaking course" and "New practical Chinese textbook". To explore and evaluate the authenticity of its pragmatics and the scientific nature of its design. The thesis is divided into three parts: in the first part, on the basis of the study of refusal speech act, we give each kind of triggered sentence (request, invitation, offer and suggestion), as well as every relationship (strange, general, good friend). Family members summarize the typical combination of Chinese refusal strategies and language devices (vocabulary, sentence structure). In the second part, we make a statistical analysis of the refusal speech acts in three sets of textbooks for TCFL, and compare the rejection strategies with the results of the Chinese refusal study. Discusses the differences between the refusal speech act in the textbook and the actual communication. At the same time, the text also investigated the rejection scenarios, refusal methods and practice design for expressing refusal speech acts. This paper points out that although most of the refusal speech acts in the three sets of textbooks conform to the pragmatic habits of Chinese native speakers, there are still some deficiencies in the textbooks in this field, such as the imbalance of rejection ratio in each scenario. Lack of key rejection strategies, lack of design of specific scenarios, etc. Finally, according to the results obtained, we point out some suggestions for building materials. Through this study, we hope to draw the textbook editors' attention to the problems existing in the textbook, thus providing some enlightenment and guidance for the dialogue and practice in the design of refusal speech acts.
【学位授予单位】：北京外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：H195.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 栾义敏;;拒绝言语行为的礼貌问题研究[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2011年03期
2 李玮;汉、英拒绝言语行为表达方式之比较[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2005年S1期
3 何春燕;;我国语用能力培养研究述评[J];外语教学理论与实践;2011年04期
4 唐玲;汉语间接拒绝言语行为的表层策略分析[J];广西社会科学;2004年10期
5 茹英;;中美文化背景下的拒绝言语行为——跨文化语用学视角下的言语行为[J];科教文汇(上旬刊);2011年08期
6 王君瑞;语用学和外语教学[J];外语学刊(黑龙江大学学报);1996年04期
7 马月兰;中美“拒绝”言语行为比较研究[J];青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1998年04期
8 马月兰;从语篇表层谈中、美拒绝策略[J];齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1999年04期
9 姚俊;从英汉拒绝策略的语用对比看中西文化差异[J];山东外语教学;2003年01期
10 牛淑杰;;文化价值观与英汉拒绝言语行为交际风格的对比研究[J];聊城大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
，本文编号：2199429
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/duiwaihanyulunwen/2199429.html
