高校教师队伍结构与科研产出——基于世界一流大学学术排名百强中美国大学数据的分析

发布时间：2018-04-11 20:29

本文选题：研究型大学 + 科研产出　；参考：《清华大学教育研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：本文基于世界一流大学学术排名数据和46所美国研究型高校10年的面板数据,分析了高校科研产出的影响因素以及高校教师队伍结构变化可能带来的影响。研究发现,高校科研产出除了由外部经济环境、高校类型、人员规模、工资水平等因素决定外,还可能受高校教师队伍的岗位、合同、职称、性别/种族结构的影响。其中,全职教师规模一定的情况下,辅助人员的增加有利于高校科研产出数量与质量的提升,非终身教职体系教师的聘用并未如预期那样有助于提高高校科研产出,助理教授得利于能够在科研上集中精力而产出较高,传统弱势群体教师比例的变化并未系统性地影响高校产出。基于上述研究发现,建议我国高校在人事制度改革中致力于发挥教师资源的比较优势,为教师提供充分的辅助支持,避免造成人力资源的浪费。
[Abstract]:Based on the academic ranking data of world-class universities and the panel data of 46 American research universities, this paper analyzes the influencing factors of scientific research output in colleges and universities and the possible influence of the changes in the structure of faculty in colleges and universities.It is found that the scientific research output is determined not only by the external economic environment, university type, personnel size and salary level, but also by the positions, contracts, titles, gender / ethnic structure of the faculty.When the scale of full-time teachers is certain, the increase of auxiliary staff is conducive to the improvement of the quantity and quality of scientific research output in colleges and universities, and the employment of teachers in non-lifelong teaching system is not as helpful as expected in improving the scientific research output of colleges and universities.Assistant professors benefit from being able to concentrate on scientific research and produce higher output. The change of the proportion of teachers in traditional disadvantaged groups does not systematically affect the output of colleges and universities.Based on the above findings, it is suggested that colleges and universities in our country should devote themselves to giving full play to the comparative advantages of teachers' resources in the reform of personnel system, provide adequate auxiliary support to teachers, and avoid wasting human resources.
【作者单位】：北京大学教育经济研究所;北京大学光华管理学院;
【基金】：教育部“一流大学财政国际比较”项目国家自然科学基金青年项目“高校教师科研生产力”(71503013)
【分类号】：G644

【相似文献】