《黄侃手批〈说文解字〉》引古文字材料研究

发布时间：2017-12-27 21:04

本文关键词：《黄侃手批〈说文解字〉》引古文字材料研究　出处：《河北大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：黄侃先生是我国近代著名的国学大师，他在文字、音韵、训诂等方面的成就早有公论，无需再述。但是，由于天不假年而著述不多，他对甲骨文金文等古文字材料的态度，至今还有很多误解，特别是他在利用甲骨文、金文等古文字材料研究《说文解字》方面所做的工作，更是一直不被世人注意。学术界不少人认为，，黄侃先生紧随恩师章太炎不信甲骨文、金文。为此，本文首先深入到章黄所处的时代背景来知人论事，并以黄侃先生与友人间的书信以及后人对他的回忆性文章和《黄侃日记》等材料为据，希望能澄清这一事实；其次，本文引用大量的事实材料着重探讨和分析了黄侃先生（及章太炎）在不同时期对金甲文的认识的转变及原因，从而进一步说明黄侃先生对古文字材料不但不抵触，而且还积极搜集、研究和利用；在此基础上，依据黄侃先生提出的笔势与笔意的理论重点地分析了《黄侃手批〈说文解字〉》中引用到的金甲文字形，进而考察和论证了黄侃先生利用古文字材料印证和校正《说文》的实际情况，并从今天学术史的角度来审视黄侃先生参照金甲文勘正《说文》的准确性，以便我们能更加全面准确地认识和了解黄侃先生的学术。
[Abstract]:Mr Kan is a famous Ancient Chinese Literature Search master in modern China, in his words, phonology, exegesis and early achievements have public opinion, no longer mentioned. However, due to short-lived and not many books, his attitude to the oracle inscriptions on bronze material, since there are a lot of misunderstanding, especially what he did in the oracle and bronze objects of ancient writing materials "Shuowen Jiezi" aspects of the work, it is not always the world attention. Many people think that the academic circles, Mr. Huang Kan followed mentor Zhang Taiyan not believe Oracle and bronze inscription. Therefore, this paper deeply to the Yellow chapter the background of the times to people and things, and to Mr. Huang Kan and friends of the letters and the descendants of his memories of the article and the "kan diary" materials such as according to, hoping to clarify this fact; secondly, this paper cites plenty of facts and materials mainly discussed and analyzed Mr. Huang Kan (and Zhang Taiyan) on the change of the understanding of Jin Jiawen in different periods, which further shows that not only do not conflict with Mr. Huang Kan on the ancient writing material, but also actively collect, research and utilization; on this basis, according to Huang Mr. McCain proposed gesture with the conception of the key theory analysis of "kan" hand group "ShuoWenJieZi quoted the gold a text form, the actual situation and investigate and demonstrate the use of ancient writing materials that Mr Kan and correction of" Shuowen ", and from The accuracy of today academic history from the perspective of Mr. Huang Kan, according to Jin Jiawen corrected "Shuowen", so that we can be more comprehensive and accurate knowledge and understanding of Mr. Huang Kan's academic.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H121;H161

【参考文献】