黄侃文学研究
发布时间:2018-04-18 05:05
本文选题:黄侃 + 《文心雕龙札记》 ; 参考:《复旦大学》2011年博士论文
【摘要】:黄侃是近代著名学者,一代国学大师,尤以小学、经学见长,与章太炎并尊为“章黄之学”,其实,他在文学方面亦成就显著,本论文欲全面系统地探讨黄侃的文学创作及其文学研究,具体分为五章: 第一章黄侃的生平与文学活动。介绍了黄侃一生丰富的文学活动,包括他从事的革命文学活动、所教授的文学类课程,及点校钞阅的大量集部典籍。 第二章黄侃的文学创作。黄侃一生创作了诗一千五百余首,词四百余首,文一百五十余篇,内容丰富,并达到了一定的艺术水准,在近代文学史上理应占有一席之地。 第三章黄侃的文学思想与诗歌批评。黄侃参与了晚清民初桐城派、《文选》派和朴学派的三大文派之争,他坚决地反对桐城派,吸收章太炎朴学派学说,补正《文选》派理论,而在这过程中,也形成了其自己的观点,即借重《文心雕龙》表达宏通的骈散观。在随后的北大新、旧文学之争中,黄侃坚决反对白话文、反对新文学,表现出对传统文化的坚守。另外,黄侃对阮籍《咏怀诗》及李商隐诗歌的评点于批评方法上有所创新,也值得注意。 第四章黄侃与“龙学”。在充分吸收和辨正前人成果的基础上,黄侃对《文心雕龙》进行了二百二十余处传统的校注,更重要的是,黄侃将研究重点转向了理论研究,特别是对创作论的理论研究,这是之前“龙学”未曾出现的新趋向。黄侃在研究《文心雕龙》时运用了忠实原文的理论研究法、参照其他六朝文论的比较研究法、联系具体作品的实证法、重视篇章联系的整体研究法,并以中和的批评态度阐释刘勰的折衷之旨,这些对现当代的《文心雕龙》研究仍具有重要的借鉴意义。黄侃在二十世纪龙学史上占有重要的地位,《文心雕龙札记》不仅是“龙学”的开山之作,更被誉为“现代科学的《文心雕龙》研究的奠基之作”,对大陆及台湾近现代“龙学”的发展都具有重大而深远的影响。 第五章黄侃与“选学”。黄侃运用广求善本对校、详考群书他校、用李善注本校、细研文本理校、借助小学等各种方法校勘《文选》,共独立校得八百余条,取得了不小的校勘成果。他对《文选》的解评,内容更为丰富,不仅对《文选》正文进行了分章断句、字词训诂、文史考证、义理解析、文学批评、参证《文心》及自抒感慨,还对李善注及其他旧注进行了较为深入的研究,由此取得了大量重要的成果。黄侃不仅促进了“传统选学”向“现代新选学”的转化,更对二十世纪“选学”的传承与发展起到了承上启下的关键作用。
[Abstract]:Huang Kan is a famous scholar of modern times, a generation of great masters of Chinese culture, especially in primary school, who is good at Confucian classics and respected as "Zhang Huang Zhi Xue" with Zhang Taiyan. In fact, he has also made remarkable achievements in literature.This thesis aims to discuss Huang Kan's literary creation and his literary research in a comprehensive and systematic way, which is divided into five chapters:Chapter one: Huang Kan's life and literary activities.This paper introduces the rich literary activities of Huang Kan's life, including his revolutionary literary activities, the literature courses taught by him, and a large number of books and records collected by him.Chapter two: Huang Kan's literary creation.Huang Kan wrote more than 1500 poems, more than 400 ci poems and 150 articles in his life. He was rich in content and reached a certain level of art. He should have a place in the history of modern literature.Chapter three: Huang Kan's literary thought and poetry criticism.Huang Kan took part in the three major schools of thought of Tongcheng School, "selected works" and "Park School" in the early Republic of China in the late Qing Dynasty. He resolutely opposed the Tongcheng School, absorbed the theory of Zhang Taiyan's School of thought, and corrected the theory of "selected works of Literature", and in the process,Also formed its own point of view, that is, relying on Wen Xin Diao long to express Hongtong's view of Pian San.In the debate between the new and old literature of Peking University, Huang Kan firmly opposed the vernacular language and the new literature, showing his adherence to the traditional culture.In addition, Huang Kan's comments on Ruan Ji's Poems and Li Shangyin's poems are also worthy of attention.Chapter IV Huang Kan and Dragon study.On the basis of fully absorbing and correcting the previous achievements, Huang Kan has made more than 220 traditional proofs of Wen Xin Diao long. More importantly, Huang Kan has shifted his research emphasis to theoretical research, especially to the theoretical study of creationism.This is a new trend that has not appeared before.In his study of Wen Xin Diao long, Huang Kan used the theoretical research method of faithful original text, referring to the comparative research method of other literary theories of the six dynasties, referring to the positive method of concrete works, and attaching importance to the whole research method of text connection.The compromise of Liu Xie is explained with a neutral critical attitude, which is still of great significance to the study of Wen Xin Diao long.Huang Kan occupies an important position in the history of dragon studies in the 20th century. The Notes on Wen Xin Diao long is not only the opening work of "Dragon study", but also known as "the foundation work of the study of Wen Xin Diao long" in modern science.It has a great and profound influence on the development of modern dragon study in mainland China and Taiwan.Chapter V Huang Kan and selected Studies.Huang Kan applied various methods such as seeking good books to the school, taking a detailed examination of the group of books, using Li Shan to note this school, carefully studying the text science school, and using various methods such as primary school to collate the selected works, and got more than 800 independent schools, and achieved quite a lot of collation results.His comments on selected works are more abundant, not only for the text of the selected works, but also for the passage of sentences, the exegesis of words, textual research on literature and history, the analysis of sense and theory, literary criticism, reference to "Wen Xin", and self-expression of feelings.In addition, Li Shan and other old notes have been deeply studied, and a large number of important results have been obtained.Huang Kan not only promoted the transformation from "traditional selection" to "modern new selection", but also played a key role in the inheritance and development of "elective study" in the 20 ~ (th) century.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:I206.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈延嘉;继往开来的选学家黄侃(季刚)[J];长春师范学院学报;1993年04期
2 栗永清;;学科史视野下的中国古代文论研究———从黄侃在北京大学开设的课程谈起[J];东方丛刊;2008年03期
3 周勋初;有关“选学”珍贵文献的发掘与利用[J];中国典籍与文化;2001年04期
4 今朔;;黄侃的《~椈省穂J];读书;1981年07期
5 李一氓;;关于黄侃的词[J];读书;1982年01期
6 周兴陆;章太炎讲解《文心雕龙》辨释[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);2003年06期
7 穆克宏;20世纪中国《文选》学研究的回顾与展望[J];福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年03期
8 苏瑞;黄侃先生对汉魏六朝词语的研究[J];古汉语研究;1995年01期
9 余国庆;阐幽释微 画龙点睛——读《文选平点》札记[J];古籍整理研究学刊;2003年03期
10 程翔章;黄侃词论略[J];黄冈师专学报;1994年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 周兴陆;[N];中华读书报;2003年
,本文编号:1766902
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/guoxuejiaoyulunwen/1766902.html