可以把国学列为一级学科吗

发布时间：2018-07-06 07:24

本文选题：国学 + 高校一级学科　；参考：《历史教学(下半月刊)》2010年05期

【摘要】：当前中国发展"国学"牵涉的方面很广,有文化上的问题,有历史上的包袱,有时人的心态,甚而有关当下国内学术和文教的整体(不只是体系)问题。我近年在国内用中文发表的文字牵涉到的方面相当广,也和这问题有些关联。2009年岁末我回美国家中度假,收到学术界同仁电子邮附寄的南开大学刘泽华先生等具名的一篇"宣言"式的文字:《把国学列为一级学科不妥》。以我在英美学术界工作三十多年的背景,反思近百年来中国受西化影响下所建立的教育和学术体制,认为从(一)在邓小平先生领导下中国近三十年来改革开放的实际经验,(二)近十多年来中国高校的演变与现状,和(三)西方近数十年来"后现代主义"对"现代主义"的批判的视野来看,刘先生等的看法还有可商榷的地方。本文略为论列。
[Abstract]:At present, the development of "Chinese culture" in China involves a wide range of aspects, there are cultural problems, historical burdens, sometimes people's mentality, and even about the current domestic academic, cultural and educational system as a whole (not just the system). The language that I have published in Chinese in China in recent years has a wide range of implications, and has something to do with it. I went back to my home in the United States for a holiday at the end of 2009. Received electronic mail from academic colleagues attached to the Nankai University, Mr. Liu Zehua, and other anonymous "Manifesto" text: "Chinese Studies as a first-level discipline inappropriate". Against the background of more than 30 years of work in the British and American academic circles, I have reflected on the educational and academic system established under the influence of Westernization in China in the last hundred years. From (1) the actual experience of China's reform and opening up in the past 30 years under the leadership of Mr. Deng Xiaoping, and (2) the evolution and present situation of Chinese universities in the past ten years or so, And (3) from the perspective of "postmodernism" critique of "modernism" in the West in recent decades, Mr. Liu's views are open to question. This paper is a brief discussion.
【作者单位】： University
【分类号】：G122

【相似文献】