中国人文学术的近代转型——胡适、傅斯年和钱穆个案
发布时间：2018-08-20 08:58
【摘要】：本文以胡适、傅斯年和钱穆为案例,指出鸦片战争和五四运动以来中国引进西方学术文化经历的特点,即对"救亡"(经世、救国、救民)关注的"现实功利"态度,压倒了对"知识、学术、真理"本身的关注。胡适的国学根底很好,但他对西方学术文化的理解很粗浅,却大力攻击传统中国文化而宣扬全盘西化;傅斯年大力推动"兰克史学",但他对兰克史学只是略知之无,他推动的其实只是清代考据学的新版;钱穆坚守中国传统学术方正博大的途径,会通文史哲学,对西学采取批判性、选择性的接受与会通,对西方文化与学术反而有异曲同工之效。钱穆很多关于学术的论说,常常比著名的重要西方学者的学说早出了二三十年。这是很值得国人反思的。
[Abstract]:Taking Hu Shi, Fu Sinian and Qian Mu as examples, this paper points out the characteristics of the western academic and cultural experience introduced by China since the Opium War and the May 4th Movement, that is, the "realistic utilitarian" attitude concerned about "saving the nation, saving the nation and saving the people". Overpowered by the concern for knowledge, scholarship, truth itself. Hu Shi had a good foundation of Chinese culture, but his understanding of Western academic culture was very shallow, but he vigorously attacked the traditional Chinese culture and propagated the overall westernization; Fu Sinian vigorously promoted "Rank historiography," but he only knew little about Rank's historiography. In fact, what he was promoting was only a new edition of textual research in the Qing Dynasty. Qian Mu adhered to the approach of Chinese traditional academic Fang Zhengzheng and was able to pass through the study of literature, history, philosophy, and adopt a critical, selective acceptance and understanding of western studies. On the contrary, Western culture and academic have the same effect. Qian Mu's many academic theories are often twenty or thirty years earlier than the famous important western scholars. This is very worthy of Chinese reflection.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学国学院;
【分类号】：K092
[Abstract]:Taking Hu Shi, Fu Sinian and Qian Mu as examples, this paper points out the characteristics of the western academic and cultural experience introduced by China since the Opium War and the May 4th Movement, that is, the "realistic utilitarian" attitude concerned about "saving the nation, saving the nation and saving the people". Overpowered by the concern for knowledge, scholarship, truth itself. Hu Shi had a good foundation of Chinese culture, but his understanding of Western academic culture was very shallow, but he vigorously attacked the traditional Chinese culture and propagated the overall westernization; Fu Sinian vigorously promoted "Rank historiography," but he only knew little about Rank's historiography. In fact, what he was promoting was only a new edition of textual research in the Qing Dynasty. Qian Mu adhered to the approach of Chinese traditional academic Fang Zhengzheng and was able to pass through the study of literature, history, philosophy, and adopt a critical, selective acceptance and understanding of western studies. On the contrary, Western culture and academic have the same effect. Qian Mu's many academic theories are often twenty or thirty years earlier than the famous important western scholars. This is very worthy of Chinese reflection.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学国学院;
【分类号】：K092
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 陈启云;;历史“知识论”与西方史学理论[J];天津师范大学学报(社会科学版);2009年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张宗福;;论《离骚》与屈原的遭遇[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2008年02期
2 李红英;近十五年戴学研究综述[J];安徽史学;2002年02期
3 史义银;再评胡适使美[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2002年05期
4 朱兆华;;邓小平“和平统一,一国两制”思想形成的政治文化背景[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2010年11期
5 张金路;黄河三角洲区域文化的渊源与特征[J];滨州师专学报;2000年03期
6 李进超;;从王海，
本文编号：2193083
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/guoxuejiaoyulunwen/2193083.html
