从提倡国学到再倡国学——国学与“国学热”刍议

发布时间：2018-10-11 18:37

【摘要】：20世纪初期从对国学的提倡到"整理国故"运动的开展,即是面对西学的强势拥入所进行的对自身传统文化的捍卫与自救,并由此呼应救亡图强的时代旋律。在这个过程中,"国粹"及其与守旧、保守相关的因素被排斥,认为国学在西学的冲击下行将消亡的悲观论调被指责,全盘否定中国传统文化价值的观点也未被认同,将"国故"视为可以解决一切问题甚或可以担当复兴中华文化"大业"的盲目情绪同样被否定,人们更愿意将"国故"或"国学"限定在学术研究范围内,以"学无中西"的视野,将"科学方法"与整理国故联系起来。时至今日,中国的综合国力与国际形象与当初已经完全不可同日而语,若再倡国学,则不应失察于以往人们对国学的争论及结论,更应重视不同时代的不同语境。
[Abstract]:At the beginning of the 20th century, from the advocacy of Chinese culture to the development of the movement of "sorting out the national heritage", it was the defense and self-saving of one's own traditional culture in the face of the strong influx of western learning, and thus echoed the strong rhythm of the times of saving one's life. In this process, the "quintessence of Chinese culture" and its factors related to conservatism and conservatism were rejected, and the pessimistic view that Chinese traditional culture would die down in the impact of western learning was criticized, and the view that the value of Chinese traditional culture was totally negated was also not accepted. The blind sentiment that "national heritage" could solve all problems or even serve as the "great cause" of reviving Chinese culture was also denied, and people preferred to confine "national heritage" or "Chinese culture" to academic research. From the perspective of "Learning without Chinese and Western", the "scientific method" is connected with the collation of national heritage. Up to now, China's comprehensive national strength and international image are completely different from those at the beginning. If we continue to advocate the study of Chinese culture, we should not overlook the arguments and conclusions on the study of Chinese culture in the past, but should pay more attention to the different contexts of different times.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学历史学院史学研究所;
【分类号】：G122

【共引文献】