不同情绪状态下心理距离对大学生道德判断的影响

发布时间：2018-07-05 17:33

本文选题：道德判断 + 情绪状态　；参考：《中国临床心理学杂志》2017年02期

【摘要】：目的:探讨不同情绪状态、时间距离和社会距离对大学生道德判断的影响。方法:随机选取87名大学生被试,分成高兴、悲伤、愤怒和平静情绪组,让被试分别观看不同视频诱发相应情绪,然后回答有关道德判断的问题,这些问题分别涉及不同的时间距离(一年前、现在和一年后)和社会距离(自己和旁观者)。结果:有关医生困境道德判断的研究结果显示,情绪类型、时间距离和社会距离三者的交互作用显著。简单效应分析表明,悲伤的情绪状态下,被试从自己的角度分析问题时的道德决策水平在三个时间点均高于从旁观者的角度分析问题时的道德决策水平;被试以旁观者的角度分析道德问题时,平静状态的道德决策分数在三个时间点均高于悲伤状态下的道德决策分数;且一年前时间点上,平静状态的道德决策分数高于快乐状态下的道德决策分数,而愤怒状态的道德决策分数高于悲伤状态下的道德决策分数。对其它道德决策分数统计分析表明,情绪状态和社会距离之间及社会距离和时间距离之间的交互作用均显著,简单效应分析表明,在愤怒和平静的情绪状态下,被试从自己的角度分析道德两难问题时的道德决策水平低于从旁观者的角度去分析问题时的道德决策水平;被试从自己角度分析问题时,其一年后的道德决策水平高于一年前的道德决策水平。结论:情绪状态、社会距离和时间距离共同对个体的道德决策产生影响。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the influence of different emotional state, time distance and social distance on moral judgment of college students. Methods: 87 college students were randomly divided into happy, sad, angry and calm mood groups. The subjects were asked to watch different videos to induce their emotions, and then to answer questions about moral judgment. These questions relate to different time distances (one year ago, now and a year later) and social distances (themselves and bystanders). Results: the results of the moral judgment of doctors'Dilemma showed that the interaction of emotional type, time distance and social distance was significant. The simple effect analysis shows that in the state of sadness, the moral decision level of the subjects when analyzing the problem from their own point of view is higher than that of the bystander in the three time points. When the subjects analyzed the moral problems from the perspective of bystanders, the score of moral decision in calm state was higher than that in sad state at three time points, and a year ago, the score of moral decision in calm state was higher than that in sad state. The score of moral decision in calm state is higher than that in happy state, while the score in angry state is higher than that in sad state. The statistical analysis of other moral decision scores shows that the interaction between emotional state and social distance and between social distance and time distance is significant. The level of moral decision in analyzing moral dilemmas from one's own perspective is lower than that when analyzing problems from bystanders' point of view, and when the subjects analyze problems from their own perspective, The level of moral decision-making after one year is higher than that a year ago. Conclusion: emotional state, social distance and time distance affect individual moral decision.
【作者单位】：新乡医学院心理学系;新乡医学院第二附属医院;
【基金】：河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究重点项目(2014-ZD-101)
【分类号】：R395.1

【参考文献】