不同类型学习困难学生认知特征与学业自我概念的研究
[Abstract]:With the continuous promotion of educational ideas and educational systems, students with learning difficulties have gradually entered the public field of vision as a special group of learning. Students with learning difficulties have a large number of students in the school range. They are a group without obvious mental defects and physical barriers, but they are relatively lagging in the actual learning activities. A special group. With the evolution of the definition of learning difficulties and the deepening of related research, the study of students with different types of learning difficulties is becoming more and more abundant. A large number of studies have proved that the cognitive process of PASS (plan attention simultaneous processing time processing) and the defects in working memory processing have resulted in students' learning. The important reasons for the difficulty, and the different types of learning difficulties may exist defect heterogeneity. The academic self-concept refers to the more stable cognition, evaluation and emotional experience of the students in the academic achievement situation in different academic fields. There are differences between the students with learning difficulties and the normal students. It is necessary for the educators to adopt some special educational models and measures to intervene and cultivate them systematically and pertinent according to the self-concept and the development level of the students. The students of Chinese learning difficulties and the twin students are the research objects. From the two cognitive factors of cognitive processing and working memory of PASS and the students' academic self concept, this paper makes a comprehensive and systematic discussion of the cognitive and academic self-concept characteristics of students with different types of learning difficulties. The students of grade seven, eight and nine in junior middle school were enrolled in a preliminary screening, and the students with low learning motivation were screened using the learning motivation diagnosis test. Secondly, the recent two period and two final mathematics and Chinese middle school exam scores were converted into Z scores to screen language difficulties, mathematical difficulties, and double difficulties. 4 groups of students in the control group were tested and excluded from the mental defects. There were 43 students who eliminated the invalid data, including 9 students with math learning difficulties, 8 students with language learning difficulties, 14 students with double difficulties and 12 students in control group. This study was divided into two parts. The study mainly discussed three subtypes of learning difficulties. In the cognitive processing, three types of learning difficult groups are included in a research framework to provide theoretical support for the cognitive intervention of the late students. The study two mainly analyzes the characteristics of the dynamic factors and the academic self concept of the students of different types of learning in academic self-concept. We hope to provide a more systematic approach to the overall intervention of students with learning difficulties. The first part is to explore the cognitive characteristics of the PASS cognitive processing model and the working memory system of the students with different types of learning difficulties. In the PASS, the first part is the study of the cognitive characteristics of the students with different types of learning difficulties. In cognitive processing tasks, the cognitive assessment system (CAS-2) (CAS-2) (Naglieri, Das, Goldstein, 2014) is used as the test material. The planned coding task and digital matching task are adopted, the expressive attention and the digital detection task are adopted, and the non speech matrix and speech space relation task is adopted in the sexual processing, and the relay time processing is adopted. The word sequence task and the digital sequence task are checked. In the working memory cognitive processing process, the voice loop uses the digital back task and the voice n-back task. The visual space template uses the visual n-back task and the Corsi point wooden block task. The central executive system uses the flanker task and the signal stop task to test. 1. the students' cognitive process of pass and the performance of working memory were significantly lower than those of the control group, and there was a universal defect in the cognitive processing ability of pass, and 2. students of various kinds of learning difficulties had different cognitive defects. The specific characteristics are as follows: (1) there is a significant correlation between plan and simultaneous processing and students with mathematics learning difficulties (r=-.62~-.57); the poor students have phonetic working memory defects; (2) there are significant defects (r=-.69~-.57) for the students of Chinese learning difficulties. On the other hand, the poor students are in the central execution. There are defects in the system; (3) there is a universal cognitive defect in the plan, the attention, the concurrent processing and the successive processing. In addition, there is a significant correlation between the speech, the visual space template and the central executive system and the double difficulties (r=-.73~-.47), and the double trapped students also have universal defects in the working memory function; (4) it will not be possible. The students of the same type of learning difficulties have two points of logistic regression analysis as the overall learning difficulties. The planning process (-2loglikelihood=14.58) in the pass cognitive model and the submission process (-2loglikelihood=6.01) have a significant predictive effect on the students with learning difficulties. The planned process task is distinguished from the submission processing task. The two cognitive tests can well predict learning difficulties. Both -2loglikelihood=8.12 and -2loglikelihood=6.01 have a significant predictive effect on students with learning difficulties. The combination of these two tasks can predict better learning. The second part of the study mainly discusses the characteristics of different types of students with different types of learning difficulties in the different dimensions of academic self-concept. The study uses the self-concept subscale in the second edition of the Self-concept Questionnaire (sdq- II) compiled by marsh and others, including Chinese, mathematics and the general academic self-concept, and the learning difficulties of different types of learning. The analysis of the characteristics of the learning self concept of the difficult students found that the academic self concept of the students with different types of learning difficulties has its own subject particularity, which is: (1) the poor students have poor results in the self-concept of mathematics, and the poor students have a lower score in the academic self-concept of the Chinese, while the double sleepy students are in the mathematical self concept. The self concept and the general academic self concept were the worst; (2) there was a significant correlation between the mathematical achievement and the mathematical self concept (r=.63), the Chinese performance and the language self-concept had a high correlation (r=.31), and the mathematical self concept was not related to the Chinese self concept; (3) the mathematics self concept, the general academic self-concept and the mathematics learning difficulties students. The correlation was significant (r=-.49~-.43). There was a significant correlation between Chinese self-concept and general academic self-concept (r=-.63~-.56). There was a significant correlation between the mathematical self-concept and the general academic self-concept (r=-.72~-.61). This study further examined the pass cognitive process, working memory and academic self probability. It is found that the general academic self-concept can still have an independent influence on the academic achievement of the students with learning difficulties, and the interpretation rate is up to the 6%. sum, and the students of different types of learning difficulties are in the PASS model. There are cognitive defects in the process of working memory, among which the poor students have some defects in the planning, the simultaneous processing and the phonetic working memory, and the poor students have defects in the plan, attention, successive processing and the central executive system. It showed that the students had a lower score in the self-concept of mathematics, the poor students had a lower score in the self-concept of language learning, while the double trapped students scored the lowest in mathematics, the Chinese and the general academic self-concept, and the academic self-concept of the double trapped students was the most serious. In addition, after controlling the role of cognitive process, the general learning was in general. Self concept still has an independent effect on academic achievement of students with learning difficulties.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G442
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周璇;蔡丹;;不同类型数学任务的PASS认知加工发展特点[J];心理科学;2016年06期
2 蔡丹;文茗;J.P.Das;周璇;;基于认知加工过程的数学训练方案述评[J];心理科学;2015年05期
3 赵鑫;周仁来;;工作记忆刷新功能的可塑性[J];心理科学进展;2014年10期
4 王晓辰;李清;;基于PASS模型的汉语阅读障碍认知加工特点的实验研究[J];心理科学;2013年03期
5 蔡丹;李其维;邓赐平;;数学学业不良初中生的工作记忆特点:领域普遍性还是特殊性?[J];心理学报;2013年02期
6 郭龙健;申继亮;;学业情绪研究及对基础教育教学改革的意义[J];天津师范大学学报(社会科学版);2012年03期
7 王晓辰;李其维;李清;;小学汉语阅读障碍儿童的PASS认知加工特点[J];心理发展与教育;2011年06期
8 宋广文;何文广;孔伟;;问题表征、工作记忆对小学生数学问题解决的影响[J];心理学报;2011年11期
9 张雅明;李勇;;学习困难学生自我概念研究综述[J];沧州师范专科学校学报;2010年04期
10 赵晶;陈传锋;;学习困难:概念演变、认知表现及其影响因素[J];心理研究;2010年03期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 董文婷;熊俊梅;王艳红;;高中生学科自我概念及焦虑情绪的语、数学科间差异及二者与学业成绩的关系[A];增强心理学服务社会的意识和功能——中国心理学会成立90周年纪念大会暨第十四届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集[C];2011年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 左志宏;小学生数学学习困难的认知加工机制[D];华东师范大学;2006年
2 赵微;汉语阅读困难学生语音意识与视觉空间认知的实验研究[D];华东师范大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 陈泊蓉;小学中高年级儿童汉语语素意识的发展特点及其与阅读理解的关系[D];陕西师范大学;2011年
2 吕京京;初中生学业情绪现状及干预研究[D];苏州大学;2013年
3 张阮钰;初中生学习投入、学业自我概念与学业情绪相关研究[D];曲阜师范大学;2014年
4 蒋春蓉;汉语阅读障碍儿童的言语工作记忆与视空间工作记忆的功能特点[D];陕西师范大学;2014年
5 王艳碧;不同类型汉语阅读障碍儿童的认知特点研究[D];西南大学;2008年
6 周甜;中学学业不良学生学校适应性与自我概念、社会支持关系的研究[D];陕西师范大学;2008年
7 张佳佳;提高高中学业不良学生学业自我概念的干预研究[D];华东师范大学;2009年
8 张晓光;小学四年级数学学习困难与优秀学生的工作记忆比较研究[D];内蒙古师范大学;2009年
9 李晓龙;PASS理论下的学习困难儿童认知功能特征研究[D];广西师范学院;2015年
,本文编号:2155376
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2155376.html