基于用户体验的大规模开放在线课程评价研究
发布时间：2018-10-21 14:58
【摘要】：在信息技术的发展以及终身教育理念的推动下,网上免费学习资源得到了人们的重视,在线学习成为人们实现自我教育的重要方式之一。为了促进教育公平,大量优质课程资源的免费开放,大规模开放在线课程(MOOC)作为网络课程的一种新形式应运而生。随着MOOC平台以及课程越来越多,MOOC课程良莠不齐,课程质量问题日益突出,随之引起各界人士的关注与批评。虽然以往的研究中对网络课程的评价有很多的评价标准以及指标体系,但是由于MOOC的独特性,以往的评价指标体系已经不能完全适应MOOC的课程评价,尤其是在学习者的用户体验方面有所欠缺。好的MOOC应该有良好的用户体验,吸引大量的用户参与其中并且能持续学习,因此本研究力图从MOOC用户的视角建立一套MOOC的课程评价指标体系。本研究运用文献法对国内外的相关文献进行梳理,参考国内外较权威的在线课程评价指标体系,对用户进行问卷调查和访谈进一步筛选MOOC课程评价指标项,通过德尔菲法、层次分析法确定MOOC评价指标权重,最后形成MOOC课程评价指标体系。该评价指标体系包括感官体验、行为体验、情感体验、内容体验以及关联体验5个维度、10个二级指标以及48个三级指标,然后确定每项指标的权重以及评价标准,最后验证评价指标体系的信效度。研究结果显示,MOOC用户对界面设计以及多媒体呈现形式有着较高的要求,视频内容在课程中起着核心的作用,在三级指标中,师生互动以及生生互动是影响课程是否带来良好体验的重要因素。后续研究需要对评价指标体系应用到若干课程评价中进行有效性验证,以便不断地优化完善评价指标体系。
[Abstract]:With the development of information technology and the promotion of life-long education concept, free online learning resources have been attached importance to, online learning has become one of the important ways to realize self-education. In order to promote the educational fairness and the free opening of a large number of high-quality curriculum resources, the large-scale open online curriculum (MOOC) emerged as a new form of online curriculum. With the increasing number of MOOC platforms and courses, the good and bad of MOOC courses are intermingled, and the problems of course quality are becoming more and more prominent, which has aroused the attention and criticism of people from all walks of life. Although there are a lot of evaluation criteria and index system in the past research, but because of the uniqueness of MOOC, the former evaluation index system can not fully adapt to the course evaluation of MOOC. In particular, there is a lack of user experience for learners. A good MOOC should have a good user experience, attract a large number of users to participate and continue to learn, so this study tries to establish a set of MOOC curriculum evaluation index system from the perspective of MOOC users. This research uses the literature method to comb the related literature at home and abroad, referring to the domestic and foreign more authoritative online course evaluation index system, carries on the questionnaire survey and the interview to the user to screen the MOOC curriculum appraisal index item further, through Delphi method, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) determines the weight of MOOC evaluation index, and finally forms the evaluation index system of MOOC curriculum. The evaluation index system includes 5 dimensions of sensory experience, behavioral experience, emotional experience, content experience and associated experience, 10 secondary indicators and 48 third-level indicators, and then determines the weight and evaluation criteria of each index. Finally, the reliability and validity of the evaluation index system are verified. The results show that MOOC users have high requirements for interface design and multimedia presentation. Video content plays a central role in the course. Teacher-student interaction and student-student interaction are the important factors that affect whether the curriculum brings good experience. In order to optimize and perfect the evaluation index system, it is necessary to verify the effectiveness of the evaluation index system applied to the evaluation of several courses.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G434
[Abstract]:With the development of information technology and the promotion of life-long education concept, free online learning resources have been attached importance to, online learning has become one of the important ways to realize self-education. In order to promote the educational fairness and the free opening of a large number of high-quality curriculum resources, the large-scale open online curriculum (MOOC) emerged as a new form of online curriculum. With the increasing number of MOOC platforms and courses, the good and bad of MOOC courses are intermingled, and the problems of course quality are becoming more and more prominent, which has aroused the attention and criticism of people from all walks of life. Although there are a lot of evaluation criteria and index system in the past research, but because of the uniqueness of MOOC, the former evaluation index system can not fully adapt to the course evaluation of MOOC. In particular, there is a lack of user experience for learners. A good MOOC should have a good user experience, attract a large number of users to participate and continue to learn, so this study tries to establish a set of MOOC curriculum evaluation index system from the perspective of MOOC users. This research uses the literature method to comb the related literature at home and abroad, referring to the domestic and foreign more authoritative online course evaluation index system, carries on the questionnaire survey and the interview to the user to screen the MOOC curriculum appraisal index item further, through Delphi method, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) determines the weight of MOOC evaluation index, and finally forms the evaluation index system of MOOC curriculum. The evaluation index system includes 5 dimensions of sensory experience, behavioral experience, emotional experience, content experience and associated experience, 10 secondary indicators and 48 third-level indicators, and then determines the weight and evaluation criteria of each index. Finally, the reliability and validity of the evaluation index system are verified. The results show that MOOC users have high requirements for interface design and multimedia presentation. Video content plays a central role in the course. Teacher-student interaction and student-student interaction are the important factors that affect whether the curriculum brings good experience. In order to optimize and perfect the evaluation index system, it is necessary to verify the effectiveness of the evaluation index system applied to the evaluation of several courses.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G434
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李五洲;汪基德;;基于模糊综合评价法的MOOC适切性研究——以“现代教育技术”课程为例[J];电化教育研究;2016年12期
2 蔡e，
本文编号：2285453
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2285453.html
