大学生同伴交往、一般自我效能感与心理健康的关系
发布时间：2018-08-29 07:26
【摘要】： 培养心理健康的人才是教育的重要目标之一，部分大学生存在不同程度的心理问题。因此本研究试图考察大学生同伴关系和一般自我效能感是如何影响心理健康的。研究采用横向研究设计，采用同伴提名法，问卷法，对中部地区某所高校320名大学生进行了调查。 研究结果显示： 1．大学生心理健康状况在生源、是否独生子女、是否贫困大学生、专业方面存在差异。农村和小城镇来源的大学生心理健康总体水平要比大中城市来源的心理健康水平差，非独生子女心理健康状况比独生子女差，贫困大学生心理健康状况比非贫困生要差，影像专业大学生比其它专业大学生心理健康水平明显低下。 2．负向提名与SCL-90总分、躯体化、焦虑、偏执、精神病性等因子正相关，社会喜好与SCL-90总分、抑郁、偏执等因子负相关，总体来看相关系数不高。一般自我效能感与SCL-90总分、强迫、人际敏感、抑郁、焦虑、敌意、恐怖、偏执、精神病性负相关。 3．负向提名高分组的大学生心理健康状况显著差于负向提名低分组，社会喜好高分组与社会喜好低分组大学生的心理健康状况差异不显著。高自我效能组心理健康状况显著好于低自我效能组心理健康状况。 4．在预测心理健康状况、焦虑、抑郁时，一般自我效能感比同伴交往能解释更多的变异量，而在预测偏执时，同伴交往比一般自我效能感能解释更多的变异量。但总体来看同伴交往与一般自我效能感对大学生心理健康的预测作用不强。
[Abstract]:Cultivating mental health talents is one of the important goals of education, and some college students have different degree of psychological problems. Therefore, this study attempts to examine how peer relationships and general self-efficacy affect mental health. In this study, 320 college students in a university in central China were investigated by lateral research design, peer nomination method and questionnaire method. The results show that: 1. There are differences in the mental health status of college students in the source of students, whether the only child, whether poor college students, professional differences. 2. The overall level of mental health of college students from rural areas and small towns is worse than that of large and medium-sized cities, the mental health of non-only children is worse than that of only children, and the mental health of poor college students is worse than that of non-poor students. 2. Negative nomination was positively correlated with total score of SCL-90, somatization, anxiety, paranoid ideation and psychosis, and social preference was associated with total score of SCL-90 and depression. Paranoid ideation and other factors negative correlation, overall correlation coefficient is not high. General self-efficacy and SCL-90 scores, compulsion, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobia, paranoia, Negative correlation of psychosis. 3. The mental health status of the students with high score of negative nomination was significantly worse than that of the low group with negative nomination, and there was no significant difference between the high score group of social preference and the low group of social preference. The mental health status of high self-efficacy group was significantly better than that of low self-efficacy group. 4. When predicting mental health, anxiety and depression, general self-efficacy could explain more variation than peer interaction. In predicting paranoia, peer interaction can explain more variation than general self-efficacy. But generally speaking, peer interaction and general self-efficacy have little effect on predicting college students' mental health.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：B844.2
本文编号：2210600
[Abstract]:Cultivating mental health talents is one of the important goals of education, and some college students have different degree of psychological problems. Therefore, this study attempts to examine how peer relationships and general self-efficacy affect mental health. In this study, 320 college students in a university in central China were investigated by lateral research design, peer nomination method and questionnaire method. The results show that: 1. There are differences in the mental health status of college students in the source of students, whether the only child, whether poor college students, professional differences. 2. The overall level of mental health of college students from rural areas and small towns is worse than that of large and medium-sized cities, the mental health of non-only children is worse than that of only children, and the mental health of poor college students is worse than that of non-poor students. 2. Negative nomination was positively correlated with total score of SCL-90, somatization, anxiety, paranoid ideation and psychosis, and social preference was associated with total score of SCL-90 and depression. Paranoid ideation and other factors negative correlation, overall correlation coefficient is not high. General self-efficacy and SCL-90 scores, compulsion, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobia, paranoia, Negative correlation of psychosis. 3. The mental health status of the students with high score of negative nomination was significantly worse than that of the low group with negative nomination, and there was no significant difference between the high score group of social preference and the low group of social preference. The mental health status of high self-efficacy group was significantly better than that of low self-efficacy group. 4. When predicting mental health, anxiety and depression, general self-efficacy could explain more variation than peer interaction. In predicting paranoia, peer interaction can explain more variation than general self-efficacy. But generally speaking, peer interaction and general self-efficacy have little effect on predicting college students' mental health.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：B844.2
【引证文献】
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前6条
1 冯香菊;体育专业大学生人际信任与自尊、一般自我效能感的相关研究[D];河南大学;2011年
2 牛竹青;高职新生同伴关系对学校适应的影响及其干预研究[D];河南大学;2011年
3 陈献莉;大学生一般自我效能感、人格特征与职业抱负的相关研究[D];哈尔滨工程大学;2011年
4 李晓侠;师范学院大学生心理地位对其师生关系和同伴关系的影响[D];首都师范大学;2009年
5 雷欣欣;师范类大学生学习倦怠状况及影响因素研究[D];内蒙古师范大学;2009年
6 徐雪娇;视障大学生同伴关系及其影响因素的研究[D];华东师范大学;2010年
，本文编号：2210600
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jykj/2210600.html
