我国城镇体系规划学科发展演进研究

发布时间：2018-03-20 19:20

本文选题：城镇体系规划　切入点：学科历史　出处：《南京大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2011年城乡规划学正式成为一级学科,历史梳理与经验总结对于学科的"科学化"与"中国化"进程具有重要意义。城镇体系规划作为我国区域层面唯一的法定规划,其发展历程能够很好地呈现中国城乡规划学科在区域尺度的探索与演化,因而具有重要的研究价值。然而,当前学界专门针对城镇体系规划学科发展历程的演化性研究较为不足,尤其缺乏对2000年以来城镇体系规划学科的新发展进行系统性梳理总结。既有研究内容大多聚焦于实践工作的发展,对理论研究、技术方法以及办学教育等学科重要组成部分关注较少,更未能对其进行整体性分析,研究成果偏重于特征总结而缺乏过程梳理与史料论证。因此,本文认为当前的城镇体系规划学科的演化性研究在延伸时间跨度、扩展内容领域、深化观点依据等方面仍存在一定的完善空间。基于以上认识,本文以城镇体系规划学科的整体性发展历程与演化特征作为研究对象,利用社会经济宏观背景变迁(社会大事件)作为依据,将城镇体系规划学科划分为1980年代中期前(计划时期)、1980年代中期至1990年代初(双轨时期)、1990年代中期至21世纪初(增长时期)、2005年以来(转型时期)四个阶段,同时构建了 "社会发展—规划实践—理论技术—教育体系"的整体性分析框架,对每一阶段的学科发展历程及其与社会环境变迁的互动关系进行一一梳理。最后,本文总结认为:1)"城镇体系规划"是动态演化发展的,其已经从特定的规划形式逐渐上升、内化成为强调统筹协调、整体系统的规划思想,极大地推动了我国"城市规划学科"转向"城乡规划学科";2)城镇体系规划学科的演变与中国总体发展环境的转型密切相关,并日益成为不同层级政府、部门之间利益博弈的平台以及城市与国家参与全球网络、乃至于重塑全球网络的工具;3)随着规划实践与理论的逐步成熟深入,城镇体系规划的学科发展从最初的以外部体系作为参照逐渐转向自我价值的觉醒与平衡,在这过程中,实践性发挥了重要的推动作用,其也成为构建中国特色学科体系的自信来源与核心优势。本文章节安排如下:第一章,绪论。主要阐述本文的研究背景与意义、研究范围与概念界定、既有研究成果以及本文框架结构。这一章主要点明本次研究的价值,并对学科发展阶段进行划分。第二章到第五章,历程梳理。利用"社会发展—规划实践—理论技术—教育体系"的整体性分析框架,对每一阶段的学科发展进行历程梳理与特征总结。第六章,结论与讨论。对学科内涵外延、角色属性、理论实践以及教育办学的发展历程与演化逻辑进行概括性的总结提炼,并就学科未来发展趋势提出展望。
[Abstract]:In 2011, urban and rural planning became a first-level discipline. The historical review and experience summarization are of great significance to the process of "scientization" and "Sinicization" of the subject. Urban system planning is the only statutory planning at the regional level in China. The course of its development can well present the exploration and evolution of the subject of urban and rural planning in China at the regional level, so it has important research value. At present, the research on the evolution of the subject of urban system planning in academic circles is relatively insufficient. In particular, there is a lack of systematic summary of the new development of urban system planning since 2000. Less attention is paid to the important components of technical methods and school education, and the whole analysis is not carried out. The research results focus on the summary of characteristics and lack of process combing and historical data argumentation. This paper holds that there is still room for improvement in the evolutionary study of urban system planning in extending the time span, expanding the content field, deepening the basis of views, etc. Based on the above understanding, This paper takes the holistic development course and evolution characteristics of urban system planning as the research object, and uses the social and economic macro-background changes (social events) as the basis. The discipline of urban system planning has been divided into four phases: before the mid-1980s (planning period) and from the mid-1980s to the early 1990s (two-track period) from mid-1990s to early 21th century (growth period, since 2005). At the same time, it constructs the holistic analysis framework of "Social Development-Planning practice-Theory Technology-Education system", and combs the course of discipline development and its interaction with social environment changes in each stage. Finally, This paper concludes that "urban system planning" is a dynamic evolution and development, which has gradually increased from a specific form of planning, internalizing it into a planning idea that emphasizes overall coordination and overall system. The evolution of urban system planning is closely related to the transformation of China's overall development environment, and has become increasingly different levels of government. The platform of interest game between departments and the tool of city and country participation in global network, and even the tool of reshaping global network, with the development of planning practice and theory, The discipline development of urban system planning has gradually changed from the external system as a reference to the awakening and balance of self-value. In the process, practicality has played an important role in promoting the development of urban system planning. This chapter is arranged as follows: the first chapter, introduction, mainly elaborates the research background and significance, the research scope and the concept definition of this paper. This chapter mainly points out the value of this study, and divides the stages of discipline development. Chapter 2 to 5th, Using the holistic analysis framework of "Social Development-Planning practice-Theory Technology-Education system", this paper summarizes the history and characteristics of each stage of discipline development. Chapter 6th, conclusion and discussion, denotes the connotation of the subject. The role attribute, the theory practice, the development course and the evolution logic of the education school are summarized and refined, and the prospect of the future development trend of the subject is put forward.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G642.3;TU984-4

【相似文献】