当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 经济理论论文 >

哈贝马斯的劳动观及其批判

发布时间:2018-03-12 16:12

  本文选题:劳动 切入点:精神 出处:《华中科技大学》2007年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】: 哈贝马斯的交往理论是法兰克福学派社会批判理论的重要发展,在当代西方马克思主义哲学中有着重要影响。而这一理论的重要基础,就在于哈贝马斯对黑格尔劳动概念的分析和理解,对马克思劳动概念的批判改造。他通过对这两个人劳动思想的研究,由此得出了与马克思不同的劳动概念。但由于国内外很多学者都把研究的重点放在黑格尔和马克思的劳动观上,对哈贝马斯本人的劳动观的研究则很少涉及。 黑格尔使劳动问题上升为哲学问题,马克思毕生关注的一个问题也是劳动,而哈贝马斯的劳动观又和黑格尔及马克思有思想上的承传。基于以上考虑,本文就黑格尔、马克思、哈贝马斯的劳动观进行比较分析,以期深入对哈贝马斯劳动观的理解。通过分析,我们也对他的劳动观中的错误思想进行了批判,他在劳动中淡化了人的意义。但批判不是目的,我们研究他的劳动的目的,在于发现他在哪些方面吸取了合理的成分,又在哪些方面误解了他们的观点,然后怎样把二者的思想融入到自己的劳动概念中。对于哈贝马斯在这两个方面思想的研究,有助于我们进一步批判地理解他的交往行为理论。不仅如此,本文的另一目的,就是通过对哈贝马斯关于马克思劳动观的批判进行批判,从而深入理解马克思的劳动、实践、交往思想。文章分四部分进行论述: 第一部分,介绍哈贝马斯对黑格尔劳动概念进行重构的原因,简单阐述黑格尔的劳动观,哈贝马斯指出了黑格尔劳动观中合理的一方面,但在一定程度上他又误解了黑格尔的劳动观。 第二部分,论述哈贝马斯对马克思劳动概念的分析和理解,我们将从他对马克思劳动概念的认同、对历史唯物主义的态度、对马克思劳动概念的批判三个方面去分析他认同和批判马克思的地方。 第三部分,本人认为哈贝马斯误解了马克思的劳动概念,我们将从他为何批判马克思劳动概念,对马克思劳动和实践概念的混淆以及他对马克思关于劳动概念美学化的错误理解三个方面去分析这一误解,同时指出他批判的实质和动机以及合理之处。第四部分,通过以上哈贝马斯对马克思劳动概念的分析和理解,可以看出他曲解了马克思的实践内涵。我们将从他本人的劳动概念入手,来分析他的劳动概念,以求合理评价哈贝马斯的劳动观。
[Abstract]:Habermas's theory of communication is an important development of the Frankfurt School's critical theory of society and has an important influence in the contemporary Western Marxist philosophy. It lies in Habermas' analysis and understanding of Hegel's concept of labor and his critical transformation of Marx's concept of labor. But many scholars at home and abroad focus on Hegel and Marx's view of labor, but the study of Habermas' own view of labor is seldom involved. Hegel raised the question of labor as a philosophical problem, and one of the problems that Marx paid attention to all his life was labor, and Habermas' view of labor was inherited from Hegel and Marx. Marx and Habermas' view on labor are comparatively analyzed in order to understand Habermas' view of labor deeply. Through the analysis, we also criticize the wrong ideas in his view of labor. He played down the meaning of man in labor. But criticism is not an end. The purpose of our study of his work is to find out in what ways he has absorbed reasonable ingredients and in what ways he has misunderstood their views. Then how to integrate the two ideas into their own concept of labor. The study of Habermas' thoughts in these two aspects will help us to further critically understand his theory of communicative behavior. It is through criticizing Habermas' view of labor to understand Marx's ideas of labor, practice and communication. The article is divided into four parts:. The first part introduces the reason why Habermas reconstructs Hegel's concept of labor, and briefly expounds Hegel's concept of labor. Habermas points out the reasonable aspect of Hegel's concept of labor. But to some extent, he misunderstood Hegel's view of labor. The second part, discusses Habermas's analysis and understanding of Marx's concept of labor, we will from his identification of Marx's concept of labor, the attitude of historical materialism, This paper analyzes the three aspects of Marx's criticism of the concept of labor to analyze his identification with and criticism of Marx. In the third part, I think Habermas misunderstood Marx's concept of labor. The confusion between Marx's concept of labor and practice and his misunderstanding of Marx's misunderstandings on the aestheticization of the concept of labor are analyzed, and the essence, motive and reasonableness of his criticism are pointed out in part 4th. Through the above analysis and understanding of Marx's concept of labor, we can see that Habermas misinterpreted Marx's practical connotation. We will begin with his own concept of labor to analyze his concept of labor. In order to evaluate Habermas's view of labor reasonably.
【学位授予单位】:华中科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2007
【分类号】:F091.3;F014.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李曙新;评哈贝马斯对历史唯物主义的“重建”[J];甘肃社会科学;2004年03期

2 郑召利;哈贝马斯和马克思交往范畴的意义域及其相互关联[J];教学与研究;2000年08期

3 陈志刚;交往理性思想:批判与乌托邦[J];教学与研究;2004年11期

4 郑召利;论哈贝马斯批判理论的认识论基础[J];宁夏社会科学;2002年02期

5 王岩;试论黑格尔实践观的历史贡献[J];南京政治学院学报;2000年06期

6 张盾;;哲学经济学视域中的劳动论题——关于马克思与黑格尔理论传承关系的微观研究[J];南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学版);2006年05期

7 钱厚诚;;哈贝马斯认识批判的危机理论[J];南通大学学报(社会科学版);2006年04期

8 汪胤;论哈贝马斯关于劳动与相互作用理论及其现实意义[J];上海交通大学学报(社会科学版);2001年03期

9 刘日明;论劳动概念在马克思政治哲学中的地位[J];胜利油田党校学报;2004年06期

10 王晓升;新社会进化论还是历史唯物主义——评哈贝马斯对历史唯物主义的重建[J];天津社会科学;2003年05期



本文编号:1602306

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/1602306.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户83ba5***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com