论中国古代宏观经济管理思想中的国家干涉主义

发布时间：2018-02-12 18:31

本文关键词： 轻重理论经济改革宏观经济管理国家干涉主义　出处：《西北大学》2005年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：中国古代存在着两种国家宏观调控的方式,一种是以司马迁为代表的“善因论”,类似于今天的自由主义,国家对经济不作过多的干涉,另一种是以管仲、桑弘羊、刘晏等人为代表的国家干涉主义,本文的研究目的是将古代中国的国家干涉主义形成一个完整的理论框架,将理论和政策研究相结合,历史和现实相结合,在进行理论整合的同时,将文章的最终落脚点放在目前中国所进行的宏观调控上。本文的理论意义在于:经济思想史界在对本文所选定的这三者的研究中已经取得了卓越的成果,但是其研究一般都较为分散化,没有将这三者集中起来研究。本文在诸多前辈老师们研究的基础上,试图将古代国家干预主义的理论内容和现实实践集中起来进行研究,分析三者之间的逻辑联系,从而能够展现出一个完整的理论体系,这是本文的理论意义之所在。本文的现实意义在于能够对于中国目前所进行的经济体制改革和宏观调控有所借鉴。中国所进行的市场化改革是一种渐进式的改革,与苏联和东欧所进行的激进式改革在路径和方式上都有所不同。实践证明,中国所选择的渐进式市场化改革是正确的,苏联和东欧所选择的激进式改革,或者说休克疗法被事实证明是错误的,其错误原因在于国家迅速将原有的计划体制打破的同时,却没有办法在短期内建立起完善的市场经济,造成一种体制上的真空。中国的渐进式改革虽然使中国经济、政治避免了剧烈的震荡,但不可避免的是这种改革方式必然决定了中国在很长的一段时间内将处于转轨时期,计划经济和市场经济两种经济长时间并存,摩擦和冲突将不可避免,市场由于种种摩擦和冲突将会陷入一种无序状态。中国经济转轨时期的各种矛盾的存在对政府的宏观调控提出了比在发达的市场经济下更高的要求,在这样一种背景下分析和研究古代宏观经济思想将对我国目前的市场化改革和政府宏观调控起着非常重要的借鉴意义。在研究方法上,本文主要运用了历史研究法、比较研究法、系统研究法、理论与应用研究法等各种研究方法,将经济思想史和经济史界结合起来分析,并将中国与西方相关理论,古代和近代进行比较分析,最大限度的体现本文的理论价值和使用价值。本文在内容上主要分析中国古代经济史学中的国家干涉主义,并在文章的结尾将其与西方宏观经济学之鼻祖凯恩斯所以简单分析。中国历史上除管仲、桑弘羊、刘晏之外还涌现了一批卓越的经济思想家和改革家,比如北宋的王安石,明代的张居正等人,但管仲、桑弘羊、刘晏三人不管是从大的思想框架上,还是在具体的经济实践中都可以说代表了中国古代的国家干涉主义,因此本文主要分析
[Abstract]:In ancient China, there were two ways of state macro-control. One was the "theory of good cause", represented by Si Maqian, similar to today's liberalism, in which the state did not interfere too much in the economy. The other was Guan Zhong and Sang Hongyang. State interventionism represented by Liu Yan and others. The purpose of this paper is to form a complete theoretical framework of national interventionism in ancient China, to combine theory with policy research, and to combine history with reality. At the same time of theoretical integration, the final focus of the article is on the macro-control carried out by China. The theoretical significance of this paper lies in: the history of economic thought has made remarkable achievements in the research of the three selected in this paper, but its research is generally more decentralized. On the basis of many previous teachers' research, this paper attempts to concentrate the theoretical content and practical practice of ancient state interventionism to analyze the logical relationship between the three. So that can show a complete theoretical system, which is the theoretical significance of this paper. The practical significance of this paper lies in being able to draw lessons from the current economic system reform and macroeconomic regulation and control in China. The market-oriented reform carried out by China is a gradual reform. It is different from the radical reforms carried out in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the way and in the way. Practice has proved that the gradual market-oriented reforms chosen by China are correct, and the radical reforms chosen by the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe are correct. In other words, shock therapy was proved wrong because the country quickly broke down the original planning system, but there was no way to establish a sound market economy in the short term. Although China's gradual reform has prevented China's economy and politics from violent shocks, it is inevitable that this type of reform will inevitably determine that China will be in a transitional period for a long period of time. As the planned economy and the market economy coexist for a long time, friction and conflict will be inevitable. Due to various frictions and conflicts, the market will fall into a state of disorder. The existence of various contradictions in the transitional period of China's economy has put forward higher requirements for the government's macro-control than under the developed market economy. In such a background, the analysis and study of ancient macroeconomic thoughts will play a very important role in China's current market-oriented reform and government macro-control. In terms of research methods, this paper mainly uses various research methods, such as historical research, comparative research, systematic research, theory and applied research, to analyze the history of economic thought and economic history. By comparing and analyzing the relevant theories of China and the West, ancient and modern times, the theoretical value and use value of this paper are embodied to the maximum extent. This paper mainly analyzes the national interventionism in the ancient Chinese economic history, and at the end of the article, it is briefly analyzed with Keynes, the originator of western macroeconomics. In addition to Liu Yan, a group of outstanding economic thinkers and reformers emerged, such as Wang Anshi in the Northern Song Dynasty and Zhang Juzheng in the Ming Dynasty, but Guan Zhong, Sang Hongyang, and Liu Yan were no matter from the big ideological framework. Or in the specific economic practice can be said to represent the ancient Chinese national interventionism, so this paper mainly analyzes
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：F092.2

【相似文献】