环境规制强度是否影响了中国工业行业的贸易比较优势

发布时间：2018-04-06 05:03

本文选题：环境规制　切入点：污染避难所假说　出处：《世界经济》2012年04期

【摘要】：本文采用三种衡量贸易比较优势的指标,就环境规制强度等因素对中国30个工业行业1998～2008年贸易比较优势的影响进行了经验分析。我们发现中国工业行业的贸易比较优势集中于劳动密集型产业,环境规制强度提升了工业行业的比较优势,规制强度以及传统的要素禀赋是工业的贸易比较优势集中于干净类行业的原因;但是环境规制强度对产业贸易比较优势的提升有"度"的限制,当环境规制强度超过一定水平时,反而不利于产业贸易比较优势的提升。物质资本强度与产业贸易比较优势之间存在倒"U"型关系,即随着物质资本强度的增加,其对工业行业贸易比较优势会有先提高后降低的影响趋势;较高的人力资本水平并不意味着较高的比较优势,这可能和中国开展大量的加工贸易有关。
[Abstract]:Using three kinds of indexes to measure the comparative advantage of trade, this paper makes an empirical analysis on the influence of environmental regulation intensity on the comparative advantage of trade in 30 industrial industries in China from 1998 to 2008.We find that the comparative advantage of trade in China's industrial industries is concentrated in labor-intensive industries, and the intensity of environmental regulation has enhanced the comparative advantages of industrial industries.The intensity of regulation and the traditional factor endowment are the reasons why the comparative advantage of trade in industry is concentrated in the clean industry, but the intensity of environmental regulation has a "degree" restriction on the promotion of comparative advantage of industrial trade.When the intensity of environmental regulation exceeds a certain level, it is not conducive to the promotion of comparative advantage of industrial trade.There is an inverted "U" relationship between the physical capital intensity and the comparative advantage of industrial trade, that is, with the increase of the physical capital intensity, the comparative advantage of industrial trade will be increased first and then decreased.Higher human capital level does not mean higher comparative advantage, which may be related to China's extensive processing trade.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学经济学院;
【基金】：2010年教育部新世纪优秀人才计划(NCET-10-0825.) 国家社科基金重点项目(10AJL007) 国家基本科研业务费青年教师资助重点项目(2010001) 2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金课题“外贸发展与碳排放强度下降的互动机理及其政策选择:基于区域和产业的比较研究”资助
【分类号】：F425;F752.6;X196;F224

【参考文献】