科斯经济学方法论研究
发布时间：2018-08-01 15:04
【摘要】： 方法论对于认识世界或改造世界具有举足轻重的作用,经济学也不例外。传统经济学从很多方面忽略现实因素,比如,完全竞争、经济人等假定,把经济运行的总体与参与者作了最理想的刻画。而科斯所倡导的经济学思想很好地弥补了这方面的缺陷。科斯的经济学研究拉近了经济学与现实的距离。对于经济体系中制度性结构的研究,科斯充分考虑了现实因素,揭示并澄清了交易成本费用和产权理论,开创了经济学领域的新制度经济时代。“企业的性质”(1937)和“社会成本问题”(1960年)就是科斯两篇最为著名的代表作。 科斯的经济理论源于他独特的经济学方法论思想,其中所蕴含的对于经济现实性与制度性的考虑,以及对经济体系整体性的把握,凸显出科斯与众不同的方法论特征。本论文通过对科斯原著的解读,并结合现阶段国内外学者对科斯方法论思想的研究成果,总结了科斯方法论思想的现实主义、整体主义、制度主义特征,并对它们之间相互联系、相互依存的关系进行了各个侧面的探讨。科斯的经济学方法论中既有对传统经济学方法论的继承,也有对传统经济学方法论的创新；其一方面脱离不开传统经济学方法论而独立存在,另一方面也包含了对于传统经济学方法论的挑战与背叛,后者更是引发了针对科斯经济思想的争论；对于如何看待科斯经济学思想的问题,本论文在总结各方争论的基础上,提出了从其方法论的角度着眼,而非纯经济学思想的角度来分析和解决科斯经济思想中矛盾性的观点。 科斯的经济学方法论思想有其独特鲜明的个人特色,他没有遵循传统意义上经济学方法论的研究定式；但不可否认科斯经济学方法论的在构建其经济理论方面起到了极其重要的基础性作用。本论文希望通过对科斯原著的解读,能够对科斯的方法论思想进行系统的梳理、评价,分析科斯这种直面现象的方法论思想对经济学及其传统方法论的影响,研讨这种方法论在经济学中所起的作用。
[Abstract]:Methodology plays an important role in understanding or transforming the world, and economics is no exception. Traditional economics ignores the realistic factors in many aspects, such as complete competition, economic man and so on. And Coase advocated the economics thought to make up this flaw very well. Coase's study of economics draws close the distance between economics and reality. For the study of the institutional structure in the economic system, Coase fully considered the realistic factors, revealed and clarified the transaction cost and property right theory, and opened a new era of institutional economy in the field of economics. The Nature of Enterprises (1937) and the Social cost problem (1960) are two of Coase's most famous masterpieces. Coase's economic theory originates from his unique thought of economic methodology, which contains the consideration of economic reality and system, as well as the grasp of the integrity of economic system, which highlights Coase's distinctive methodological characteristics. Based on the interpretation of Coase's original works and the research achievements of scholars at home and abroad on Coase's methodology at present, this paper summarizes the characteristics of Coase's methodology, such as realism, holism and institutionalism. At the same time, the relationship of their interrelation and interdependence is discussed in various aspects. Coase's economics methodology not only inherits the traditional economics methodology, but also has the innovation to the traditional economics methodology, on the one hand, it exists independently from the traditional economics methodology. On the other hand, it also contains the challenge and betrayal to the traditional economics methodology, which leads to the controversy of Coase's economic thought. This paper puts forward the viewpoint of analyzing and resolving the contradiction in Coase's economic thought from the point of view of methodology rather than pure economics. Coase's thought of economic methodology has its own distinctive individual characteristics, and he does not follow the research formula of economics methodology in the traditional sense. But it is undeniable that the methodology of Coase's economics plays an extremely important and fundamental role in the construction of its economic theory. This paper hopes to analyze the influence of Coase's methodology on economics and its traditional methodology through the interpretation of Coase's original works and the systematic analysis and evaluation of Coase's methodology. Study the role of this methodology in economics.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：F091.3
本文编号：2157960
[Abstract]:Methodology plays an important role in understanding or transforming the world, and economics is no exception. Traditional economics ignores the realistic factors in many aspects, such as complete competition, economic man and so on. And Coase advocated the economics thought to make up this flaw very well. Coase's study of economics draws close the distance between economics and reality. For the study of the institutional structure in the economic system, Coase fully considered the realistic factors, revealed and clarified the transaction cost and property right theory, and opened a new era of institutional economy in the field of economics. The Nature of Enterprises (1937) and the Social cost problem (1960) are two of Coase's most famous masterpieces. Coase's economic theory originates from his unique thought of economic methodology, which contains the consideration of economic reality and system, as well as the grasp of the integrity of economic system, which highlights Coase's distinctive methodological characteristics. Based on the interpretation of Coase's original works and the research achievements of scholars at home and abroad on Coase's methodology at present, this paper summarizes the characteristics of Coase's methodology, such as realism, holism and institutionalism. At the same time, the relationship of their interrelation and interdependence is discussed in various aspects. Coase's economics methodology not only inherits the traditional economics methodology, but also has the innovation to the traditional economics methodology, on the one hand, it exists independently from the traditional economics methodology. On the other hand, it also contains the challenge and betrayal to the traditional economics methodology, which leads to the controversy of Coase's economic thought. This paper puts forward the viewpoint of analyzing and resolving the contradiction in Coase's economic thought from the point of view of methodology rather than pure economics. Coase's thought of economic methodology has its own distinctive individual characteristics, and he does not follow the research formula of economics methodology in the traditional sense. But it is undeniable that the methodology of Coase's economics plays an extremely important and fundamental role in the construction of its economic theory. This paper hopes to analyze the influence of Coase's methodology on economics and its traditional methodology through the interpretation of Coase's original works and the systematic analysis and evaluation of Coase's methodology. Study the role of this methodology in economics.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：F091.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 李江;论科斯对经济学方法论的贡献——以《社会成本问题》为例[J];湖北经济学院学报;2004年04期
2 杨立雄;“个体主义”抑或“整体主义”[J];经济学家;2000年01期
3 张曙光;;论制度均衡和制度变革[J];经济研究;1992年06期
4 傅耀;当代西方新制度经济学方法论探析[J];内蒙古社会科学(汉文版);2002年04期
，本文编号：2157960
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jjsxs/2157960.html
