林业绿色经济发展评价指标体系研究
[Abstract]:All kinds of resources and environmental problems brought by the development of traditional economy make mankind explore and find a better way of development. Circular economy, low carbon economy, ecological economy and green economy are all new ways to be explored in human practice. At present, the green economy is highly respected, which is determined by the advantages of developing green economy. Under the background of green economy, the ecological function of forest resources is irreplaceable, the advantages of forestry development are gradually recognized and recognized, and forestry development is faced with unprecedented opportunities and challenges. In its report, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) defined forestry as the foundation and key of the green economy. Therefore, applying the theory of green economy to forestry development, that is, developing forestry green economy, is of great significance and contribution to the realization of green economic and social development and the sustainable development of forestry. Based on the study of green economy theory and forestry related theory, this paper defines the definition and connotation of forestry green economy, and constructs the evaluation index system of forestry green economy development in China, which consists of five system layers. 11 criterion layers and 51 basic indicators are used to determine the weight of the index by using the combined weighting method (AHP and entropy method). The development level of forestry green economy in 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government) of China in 2013 was measured by comprehensive evaluation method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, and the cluster analysis was used to analyze it. The evaluation results show that the development level of forestry green economy in 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government) is quite different. Heilongjiang had the highest score of 0.405, followed by Jilin with a score of 0.369. The result of fuzzy evaluation shows that some progress has been made in the development of forestry green economy in all provinces of China, but there is still great room for improvement. From the fuzzy evaluation grade, there are only 2 provinces with poor grade, 0 with excellent grade and only 4 with good grade. The comparative analysis of the two evaluation results shows that the development of each link of forestry green economy in Heilongjiang and Jilin Province is relatively balanced, while the comprehensive evaluation ranks third in Tibet and fourth in Inner Mongolia in the unbalanced development of forestry green economy. Have obvious advantage index, also have obvious short board problem. Finally, four provinces, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Tibet and Inner Mongolia are selected for typical analysis.
【学位授予单位】:北京林业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:F326.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 黄常州,丁登山,邬震;基于生态足迹的社会经济发展评价——以江苏南通市为例[J];生态经济;2005年10期
2 刘福忠;黄莹玉;;低碳经济发展评价指标体系的构建[J];绿色财会;2012年08期
3 江正平;张伟;雷亮;;省域低碳经济发展评价指标体系的构建及测评[J];广东农业科学;2012年01期
4 吴未;路平山;;县域低碳经济发展评价——以惠民县为例[J];安徽农业科学;2011年22期
5 赵萌;沈哲;郑文;;基于熵的循环经济发展评价可靠性研究——以“京津冀”经济区为例[J];生态经济;2013年05期
6 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前6条
1 记者 崔立勇;35城市总部经济发展评价报告将发布[N];中国经济导报;2009年
2 王鹏飞;全市年终考核工作展开[N];威海日报;2006年
3 张平阳;高新区跻身全国先进行列[N];西安日报;2004年
4 记者昝雅文;加快发展 再上新台阶[N];抚顺日报;2011年
5 南方日报记者 洪继宇 通讯员 谢锡城;汕尾办好民生实事建幸福宜居城[N];南方日报;2012年
6 本报评论员;充分发挥政府的主导作用[N];新乡日报;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 张倩;河北省循环经济发展评价研究[D];河北大学;2009年
2 牛会娟;河南省循环经济发展评价研究[D];郑州大学;2011年
3 邵佳;湘西州循环经济发展评价研究[D];中南大学;2010年
4 刘瑛;广西北部湾经济区县域循环经济发展评价[D];广西师范学院;2011年
5 周桂萍;基于熵AHP法的经济发展评价[D];大连理工大学;2007年
6 秦毓军;广西桂林市县域循环经济发展评价研究[D];广西师范学院;2012年
7 易芷娟;北京沟域经济发展评价指标体系研究[D];长江大学;2013年
8 徐萌;林业绿色经济发展评价指标体系研究[D];北京林业大学;2015年
9 刘雪丽;低碳经济发展评价指标体系研究[D];南京邮电大学;2013年
10 张明胜;江西省低碳经济发展评价指标体系的构建及实证分析[D];南昌大学;2011年
,本文编号:2363046
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/2363046.html