《庄子》寓言中的对辩研究

发布时间：2018-05-01 18:19

本文选题：《庄子》 + 寓言　；参考：《青岛大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：对辩和寓言结合使用是《庄子》语言的鲜明特点。庄子运用语言过程中,善于把握“言”与“不言”的度,既达到言道说理的目的,又生发言外之意。对辩是在现代文学对话理论及中国古代逻辑学辩对结构的基础上构建的一个概念,既从文体角度明晰了历来《庄子》文体类别划分的混乱,又从语言角度形象地描述了文本对话的生发过程。通过文本内容梳理,首次详细地罗列出《庄子》的寓言和对辩使用情况,结合前人对《庄子》文本主题内容的划分,尝试性地将《庄子》的内容归结为至人无己、神人无功、圣人无名三类。《庄子》对辩特色鲜明。对辩主体的多元、对辩结构的多样、对辩结语的开放使读者仿佛置身一个大的对话场,从多样的对话中,体悟庄子之道。同时,庄子用虚实相融的手法设置对辩,用严密的逻辑思维生发对辩,用生动的比喻阐释对辩,用诗意的语言美化对辩,使对辩充满浓厚的艺术色彩。庄子文学熠熠生辉,战国诸子散文望其项背。通过与《孟子》、《韩非子》寓言和对辩的横向比较分析,凸显庄子对寓言和对辩的驾驭能力。《庄子》对辩影响深远。于后世文学,影响了宋玉等文人的行文以及对话体赋和对辩体文学的形式特征；于今世,为我们如何在一个多元价值时代开展政治、经济、文化领域的对话提供启示。
[Abstract]:The combination of debate and fable is the distinctive feature of Zhuangzi language. In the process of using language, Zhuangzi is good at grasping the degree of "speech" and "not speaking", which not only achieves the purpose of saying and reasoning, but also gives birth to implication. On the basis of the theory of dialogue in modern literature and the structure of logic in ancient China, the concept of argumentation is constructed, which not only clarifies the confusion of the classification of style in Zhuangzi, but also makes clear from the stylistic point of view. From the perspective of language, the paper vividly describes the process of the development of the text dialogue. Through combing the content of the text, for the first time, a detailed list of the fables of Zhuangzi and the usage of the arguments and arguments are listed in detail. Combining with the division of the subject content of the text of Zhuangzi by predecessors, the content of Zhuangzi is tentatively reduced to that of the most people without self, and the deity and the man have no merit. The saints are unknown. Zhuangzi has distinct characteristics of argument. The diversity of the main body of the debate, the diversity of the structure of the debate, and the opening of the conclusion of the debate make the reader seem to be in a large dialogue field, from the various dialogues, Zhuangzi's way of understanding. At the same time, Zhuangzi sets up the argument with the method of the combination of the false and the real, with strict logical thinking, with vivid metaphor to explain the argument, beautifies the argument with the poetic language, and makes the debate full of rich artistic color. Zhuangzi literature sparkled, and the prose of the warring States period was very popular. By comparing with Mencius, Han Feizi, fables and arguments, Zhuangzi's ability to master fables and arguments is highlighted. Zhuangzi has a profound influence on the debate. The literature of later generations has influenced the writing of Song Yu and the formal characteristics of the literary style of dialogue and argument, and in this world, it provides us with enlightenment on how to carry out the dialogue in the field of politics, economy and culture in a multi-value era.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：I206.2

【参考文献】