建设工程监理取费现状分析及研究
发布时间:2018-05-26 23:38
本文选题:工程建设监理 + 监理取费 ; 参考:《清华大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:工程建设监理在工程建设过程中发挥了重要的监督、管理作用,大幅度降低了工程质量、安全等事故的发生。20世纪80~90年代,在国家强制执行工程建设监理制及大力扶持监理行业的背景下,建设工程监理行业迅速发展及壮大,但由于监理取费低等原因阻碍了监理行业的健康发展。2007年4月国家发展和改革委员会、建设部联合发布了《建设工程监理与相关服务收费管理规定》,结束了1992年以来一直沿用的建设工程监理收费标准。根据规定,建设工程监理取费根据建设项目情况采用不同的计费方式,主要为采取政府指导价及市场调节价两种方式。实行政府指导价的建设工程监理取费基准价可根据收费标准上下浮动20%,具体浮动值由委托人和监理人协商。实行市场调节价的建设工程监理取费由委托人根据招标及投标人投标情况在满足招投标法的前提下,选择投标人并通过协商方式确定监理取费。 但受制定的建设工程监理取费标准偏低、监理行业门槛逐步降低、取费标准就低不就高、企业间恶意竞争、业主拆解建设项目降低监理费、业主有意压低监理费、调差制度未全面实行等因素影响,建设工程监理取费水平一直在低位运行。进而产生监理企业利润降低、企业经营困难、监理行业发展滞缓、监理人员素质逐步降低、监理工作质量降低、优秀人才不愿从事监理工作及监理责、权、利不匹配等问题,最终导致建设工程监理行业发展出现滞缓的局面。所以有必要从各方面认真分析监理取费现状及偏低的原因,进而找出解决问题的途径。 首先,本文从作者所经历的监理项目出发,分析我国建设工程监理取费的现状,并通过将我国建设工程监理取费水平与国内相关行业对比、与国际监理行业发展较好的国家进行对比及通过实际案例分析,找出我国监理取费存在的问题,指出其危害性。其次,通过过程的分析、推理及实践,找出影响我国监理取费偏低的因素,以实际工程项目为背景对各个因素进行认真分析、研究,最终找出解决监理取费偏低的办法并提出相应的建议。最后,结合笔者的监理项目及企业管理经验,对解决监理行业及监理企业的发展出现的问题提出一些应对措施及建议,以实现监理行业及企业健康发展。
[Abstract]:The supervision of engineering construction has played an important role in supervision and management in the process of engineering construction, which has greatly reduced the occurrence of accidents such as engineering quality and safety in the 8090's of the 20th century. Under the background of the compulsory execution of the construction supervision system and the vigorous support of the supervision industry, the construction engineering supervision industry has developed rapidly and expanded. However, the healthy development of the supervision industry has been hindered by the low fees for supervision. In April 2007, the National Development and Reform Commission, The Ministry of Construction jointly issued the regulations on charge Management of Construction Engineering Supervision and related Services, ending the standard of charge for Construction Engineering Supervision which has been used since 1992. According to the regulations, the construction project supervision adopts different charging methods according to the construction project situation, mainly adopting two ways of government guiding price and market regulating price. The base price of construction project supervision can float 20 according to the charge standard, and the concrete floating value is negotiated by the principal and supervisor. According to the bidding situation and the bidding situation of the bidder, the client selects the bidder and determines the supervision fee by negotiation under the premise of satisfying the bidding law. However, the standard of fees for construction project supervision is on the low side, and the industry threshold for supervision is gradually lowered, so the standard of collection of fees will be low or high. The malicious competition among enterprises will result in a reduction of supervision fees by owners in dismantling construction projects, and the intention of the owners to lower the supervision fees. The adjustment system is not fully implemented and other factors, construction supervision fees have been operating at low levels. Furthermore, problems such as lower profits of supervision enterprises, difficulties in managing enterprises, slow development of supervision industries, gradual decline in the quality of supervisors, lower quality of supervision work, unwillingness of outstanding talents to engage in supervision work and mismatch of supervision duties, rights and interests, etc. Eventually lead to the construction project supervision industry development slow-down situation. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the current situation of supervision fees and the causes of low fees from all aspects, and then find out the way to solve the problem. First of all, based on the supervision project experienced by the author, this paper analyzes the current situation of construction project supervision fee collection in China, and compares the level of construction project supervision fee collection with that of domestic related industries. Compared with the countries with good development of international supervision industry and through the analysis of practical cases, this paper finds out the problems existing in China's supervision fee collection and points out its harmfulness. Secondly, through the analysis, reasoning and practice of the process, find out the factors that affect the low cost of supervision in our country, take the actual project as the background to seriously analyze and study the various factors, Finally, find out the solution to the low cost of supervision and put forward corresponding suggestions. Finally, combined with the author's supervision project and enterprise management experience, the author puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions to solve the problems in the development of supervision industry and supervision enterprise, so as to realize the healthy development of supervision industry and enterprise.
【学位授予单位】:清华大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:TU712.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄林青;徐相莉;刘洪峰;;关于工程建设监理取费标准的思考[J];重庆科技学院学报;2006年01期
2 张小鹏;;工程建设监理取费现状浅析[J];甘肃科技;2006年06期
3 张清遐;薛振声;;我国建设监理制度的形成与发展[J];工程质量;2012年S1期
4 赵文斌;;监理存在问题解决之思路[J];安装;2010年07期
5 越洪杰;;浅析当前监理工作中的一些问题[J];黑龙江交通科技;2008年06期
6 姚刚;赵红丽;;现阶段我国工程建设监理存在的问题及对策[J];黑龙江科技信息;2008年29期
7 吕所章,隋作玲;监理合理取费的测算及调整建议[J];建设监理;2002年04期
8 郭志涛;杨明宇;;监理取费新标准与行业对策[J];建设监理;2008年04期
9 郭广魁;;执行新监理取费办法的问题探讨与对策[J];建设监理;2008年06期
10 王玲;王刚;;试析当前建设监理市场存在的主要问题及解决方案[J];技术与市场;2009年11期
,本文编号:1939447
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/sgjslw/1939447.html