搜索引擎服务提供者著作权侵权责任分析

发布时间：2018-01-30 05:27

本文关键词： 搜索引擎过错责任原则网页快照避风港红旗标准　出处：《中国政法大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 著作权与传播技术的发展进步有着密切联系,每一次传播技术的进步都会带来著作权保护的相关新问题的产生。互联网技术的产生与进步同样引起了很多有关著作权保护的挑战,也从另一方面促进了知识产权保护事业的进步。互联网络给人们带来的利益在于其开放性、兼容性、快捷性与跨国传播。面对爆炸的网络信息,信息时代呼唤着一种信息定位工具的出现,于是搜索引擎诞生了。搜索引擎的产生就是为了方便用户搜索文件,为社会带来了便利。随着搜索引擎服务的发展,搜索引擎变得更加人性化、专业化、多样化,涌现出各种人性的服务,在提供传统的链接服务的同时,还提供链接网页信息的“网页快照”服务。搜索结果也更加细化,涌现出图片搜索、音乐搜索等经过服务商精心整理过的更“人性化”,更精细的搜索服务。然而,这种服务进步、升级的同时,也引起了著作权保护的纠纷。 “叶延滨诉搜狐、新浪网络侵权案”被称为“中国搜索引擎第一案”,引起了关于搜索引擎是否侵犯著作权的思考。“十一家唱片公司诉搜狐音乐搜索侵权”认定了搜索引擎侵权性质,确立了认定搜索与链接服务提供者主观过错的标准,然而,北京市高级人民法院对“浙江泛亚电子商务有限公司诉百度公司侵犯著作权案”的宣判结果却与“搜狐案”截然相反。这些案件引起了有关搜索引擎网页快照是否侵权、搜索链接是否构成侵权、如何认定搜索与链接服务提供者主观过错、搜索与链接服务提供者什么条件下承担责任、什么条件下才能免责等问题的思考。本文通过分析搜索引擎服务的特征,结合国际上相关的法律规定,尝试解释以上问题。除了引言和结论部分,全文分为四个部分:第一部分主要分析搜索引擎的原理以及近年出现的相关法律问题、典型案例。第二部分主要分析搜索引擎相关的著作权侵权行为类型,阐述了搜索引擎主要会涉及著作权中的复制权和信息网络传播权。第三部分分析搜索引擎服务提供者的侵权责任,明确搜索引擎提供者的过错责任归责原则和相关的法律责任,并分析免责条件以及过错的认定。第四部分针对我国的现有法律制度的缺失提出笔者的一些完善建议。
[Abstract]:Copyright is closely related to the development and progress of communication technology. Each time the progress of communication technology will bring about new problems related to copyright protection. The emergence and progress of Internet technology has also caused a lot of challenges about copyright protection. On the other hand, it has promoted the progress of intellectual property protection. The benefits brought by the Internet lie in its openness, compatibility, rapidity and transnational communication. In the face of the explosion of network information, the information age calls for the emergence of an information location tool. So search engine was born. Search engine is to facilitate users to search for files, for the community to bring convenience. With the development of search engine services, search engines become more humanized and professional. Diversified, the emergence of a variety of human services, while providing traditional link services, but also provide links to web page information "web snapshot" service. The search results are more refined, emerging image search. Music search is a more "humanized" and more sophisticated search service that has been carefully arranged by service providers. However, the progress and upgrading of this service has also led to disputes over copyright protection. "Ye Yanbin v. Sohu, Sina network infringement case" is called "China's first search engine case." Has caused the ponder about whether the search engine infringes the copyright. "11 record companies v. Sohu music search infringement" confirmed the search engine infringement nature. The criteria for determining the subjective fault of search and link service providers are established, however. The verdict of Beijing higher people's Court on Zhejiang Pan Asia Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. V. Baidu Company infringing copyright case is related to Sohu case. On the contrary, these cases give rise to whether search engine page snapshots are infringing. Whether the search link constitutes infringement, how to identify the subjective fault of the search and link service provider, and under what conditions the search and link service provider should bear the responsibility. This paper analyzes the characteristics of search engine service and tries to explain the above problems by analyzing the characteristics of search engine service and combining with the relevant international laws and regulations. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into four parts: the first part mainly analyzes the principles of search engines and related legal issues in recent years. The second part mainly analyzes the types of copyright infringement related to search engine. The third part analyzes the tort liability of search engine service provider. Clear search engine provider fault liability attribution principle and related legal liability. Part 4th puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the existing legal system of our country.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D923.41

【引证文献】