被撤销论文作者管理机制的构建探析

发布时间：2018-02-21 23:21

本文关键词： 撤销论文撤销论文声明学术不端作者管理机制　出处：《中国科技期刊研究》2017年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：【目的】基于我国被撤销论文作者的管理现状,探讨被撤销论文作者管理的要点以及方法。【方法】检索中国知网与万方数据库中2007年1月1日至2016年12月31日发布的撤销论文声明,提取处理作者的相关信息,分析存在的问题,在此基础上提出构建被撤销论文作者管理机制的方法。【结果】检索到包含处罚作者信息的撤销论文声明共14篇,其中涉及的学术不端行为主要为抄袭或剽窃、重复发表,处罚方式主要为在数年内拒绝相关作者再次投稿与通报。处罚措施存在对作者主观恶意定性不清,对合著作者承担的责任区分不明,处理随意性大、缺乏合理依据等问题,表明国内对被撤销论文作者的管理未给予足够重视,尚缺乏有效管理机制。【结论】应当加强对被撤销论文作者的管理,可以充分发挥期刊主管、主办部门职能,着重发挥相关学科学会以及出版伦理专业委员会的作用,通过建立学术不端问题共享信息数据库,健全学术不端问责制度、被撤销论文管理以及上报制度,建立被撤销论文作者的合理管理机制。
[Abstract]:[objective] based on the current situation of the management of the authors of the cancelled papers in China, This paper discusses the key points and methods of the author management of the cancelled paper. [methods] to retrieve the statement of the revoked paper published from January 1st 2007 to December 31st 2016 in the database of China Zhiwang and Wanfang, and to extract and process the relevant information of the author, Based on the analysis of the existing problems, this paper puts forward a method to construct the management mechanism of the cancelled author. [results] there are 14 disclaimers that contain the information of punishing the author, in which the academic misconduct involved is mainly plagiarism or plagiarism. The way of punishment is to refuse the relevant authors to submit articles and circulars again within a few years. The punishment measures are not clear to the author's subjective and malicious nature, the responsibilities of the author are not clear, and the handling of the punishment is arbitrary. The lack of reasonable basis indicates that the management of the cancelled author is not paid enough attention and the effective management mechanism is still lacking. [conclusion] We should strengthen the management of the author of the cancelled paper, so as to give full play to the journal supervisor. The function of the sponsoring department is to give full play to the role of the relevant subject society and the professional committee of ethics of publishing, by establishing a database of information sharing on academic misconduct issues, improving the system of accountability for academic misconduct, removing the management of papers and reporting the system. To establish a reasonable management mechanism for the author of the cancelled paper.
【作者单位】：《中医杂志》编辑部;
【基金】：中国科协精品科技期刊工程学术质量提升项目(IV-XSZL-113) 中国中医科学院基本科研业务费自主选题项目(ZZ0808022)
【分类号】：G237.5;G322

【相似文献】