宪法惯例与自治规范的二元界分——论党内法规在我国法治体系中的定位

发布时间：2018-02-26 12:46

本文关键词： 党内法规法治体系定位宪法惯例自治规范　出处：《探索与争鸣》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：党内法规建设是我国法治建设立足于中国国情的具体体现,如果忽视党内法规在我国法治体系中的应有地位,我国的法治体系建设必然是与现实脱节的。然而,党内法规在我国法治体系中究竟应当如何定位?学界对于这一基本问题至今莫衷一是,现有的党规是法律说、法与政策说、软法说均存在一定的缺漏。为了准确、合理地对党内法规进行定位,应当根据党内法规的调整对象不同,将党内法规区分为调整领导、执政行为的党内法规与调整党自身运行行为的党内法规两种类别。调整领导、执政行为的党内法规一般属于宪法惯例,而调整党自身运行行为的党内法规则属于社会组织的自治规范。对党内法规的这一定位,既能够合理地解释部分党内法规作为国家机关运行依据的现象,又能够维护宪法法律的权威,不至于陷入将党内法规与法律混同的理论误区。
[Abstract]:The construction of inner-party laws and regulations is the concrete embodiment of our country's legal construction based on China's national conditions. If we ignore the due status of inner-party laws and regulations in our country's legal system, the construction of our country's rule of law system is bound to be out of touch with the reality. How should the inner-party laws and regulations be positioned in the legal system of our country? There is no consensus in academic circles on this basic issue. The existing party rules are the theory of law, the theory of law and policy, and the theory of soft law. According to the different objects of regulation within the Party, the law and regulations of the Party should be divided into two categories: the regulation of leadership, the regulation of ruling behavior, and the regulation of the Party's own running behavior. The inner-party laws and regulations governing behavior generally belong to the constitutional convention, while the rules of inner-party law regulating the Party's own running behavior belong to the autonomous norms of social organizations. It can not only reasonably explain the phenomenon of some inner-party laws and regulations as the basis for the operation of state organs, but also can maintain the authority of constitutional law, so as not to fall into the theoretical misunderstanding of mixing inner-party laws and laws.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D262.6;D920.0

【相似文献】