回顾与反思:中巴长征的比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-13 08:29

  本文选题：长征　切入点：中国　出处：《广西社会科学》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中国共产党领导的二万五千里长征与巴西"普列斯特斯纵队"长征分别在各自国度的革命历史上产生重要的意义,但由于主体动机、指导思想、斗争方式的差异,最终遭遇了不同的结局:前者是中国共产党主动应对危机实行的战略转移,后者是普列斯特斯纵队面临困境的被动选择;前者是以实际行动宣传和践行对共产主义的坚定信仰,后者依靠理想行为和英雄主义的建构;前者发展了运动战理论,后者停留在传统斗争的方式;前者形成了"长征精神",后者没有提出自己的革命纲领;前者走出了一条适合自己国情的革命道路,影响了中国历史的发展,后者失去了民主革命运动的领导舞台,导致政治僵局的出现。
[Abstract]:The 25,000 Li long March led by the Communist Party of China and the long March of the Brazilian "Prestes column" have important significance in the revolutionary history of their respective countries, respectively, but due to the differences in the main motive, guiding ideology, and the way of struggle, In the end, different outcomes were encountered: the former was a strategic shift of the CPC's initiative to deal with the crisis, and the latter was the passive choice of the Plestis column facing difficulties; the former propagated and practiced its firm belief in communism through practical actions. The latter relies on the construction of ideal behavior and heroism; the former develops the theory of mobile warfare, while the latter stays in the way of traditional struggle, the former forms the "long March spirit", and the latter does not put forward his own revolutionary program; The former has set out a revolutionary road suitable for its own national conditions, which has affected the development of Chinese history, while the latter has lost the leading stage of the democratic revolutionary movement, leading to the emergence of political deadlock.
【作者单位】： 海南大学政治与公共管理学院;武汉大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：D231;D777.7
，

本文编号：1605591