中共六届六中全会前后关于“抗日民族统一战线”的论争

发布时间：2018-07-21 12:40

【摘要】：中共六届六中全会前后,党内爆发的关于抗日民族统一战线的争论,看似是政策之争,实质上是路线之争和深层次的理论论争。其起因是苏联(共产国际)、国民党、中共内部对抗日民族统一战线的认识和定位不一,由此引发了策略还是战略,游击战还是运动战两大问题的争论,争论背后是中共内部对抗战道路、依靠力量、领导权、发展方向的认识不一致。这种不一致随即被六届六中全会所"统一",毛泽东不仅在政策上主导了"抗日民族统一战线",而且由此争论作出了"马克思主义中国化"的理论阐释,共产国际选择了认可,而国民党则不然,这样就与中共的分歧愈加明显。事实上此后的"抗日民族统一战线"逐步演变成国共独立领导下的各自行动,从这一点讲,中共在抗日战争中的中流砥柱作用是势所必然、也是理所应当的。
[Abstract]:Before and after the sixth Plenary session of the sixth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC), the debate on the anti-Japanese national United front broke out within the Communist Party of China. The reason is that the Soviet Union (Comintern), the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China have different understanding and positioning of the anti-Japanese national United front, which has led to the controversy between strategy or strategy, guerrilla warfare or mobile warfare. Behind the controversy lies the inconsistency of understanding of the internal Chinese Communist Party's path to the War of Resistance, relying on strength, leadership, and direction of development. This inconsistency was then "unified" by the sixth Plenary session of the sixth Central Committee. Mao Zedong not only dominated the "Anti-Japanese National United Front" in policy, but also argued over the theoretical interpretation of "Sinicization of Marxism", which the Communist International chose to recognize. The KMT, on the other hand, has become increasingly divided from the Chinese Communists. In fact, the "Anti-Japanese National United Front" gradually evolved into the respective actions under the independent leadership of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party. From this point of view, the role of the CPC as a mainstay in the War of Resistance against Japan is inevitable and well-deserved.
【作者单位】：《求是》杂志社;
【基金】：中国社会科学院创新工程重大项目“世界社会主义运动的历史经验和新发展”(2014YCXZD010)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D231

【参考文献】