从揽政到懒政的政治学分析
发布时间：2018-08-28 13:05
【摘要】：从政治现象的角度上分析,揽政与懒政是表现为两种完全不同的心理取向和行为取向的政治现象,但它们都是一定国家权力结构和社会经济关系的产物。这两者既可以同时存在于同一个历史时期、同一个制度框架内,也可以作为两种极端的心态和行为,存在于社会发展的历史进程中。在我国现阶段,一方面揽政现象在相当程度上还较普遍存在;但另一方面,懒政是进一步深化改革、完善社会主义民主法制、实现国家治理体系和治理能力现代化进程中的新问题。从揽政到懒政这是一种怎样的历史变化?支撑这种变化的社会制度基础又是什么?如何消除懒政以促进从消极无为到积极有为的制度建设、形成国家公共权力的良性循环?这是值得当代政治学、行政学深入研究的焦点问题,有必要将治理懒政纳入全面从严治党之中,作为全面从严治党的重要组成部分。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of political phenomenon, the two political phenomena, which are completely different psychological orientation and behavior orientation, are political phenomena, but they are both the products of certain state power structure and social and economic relations. Both of them can exist in the same historical period and the same institutional framework at the same time. They can also exist in the historical process of social development as two kinds of extreme mentality and behavior. At the present stage of our country, on the one hand, the phenomenon of taking over political affairs is quite common, but on the other hand, lazy government is to further deepen the reform and perfect the socialist democracy and legal system. New issues in the process of modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity. What kind of historical change is it from taking over politics to being lazy? What is the basis of the social system that underpins this change? How to eliminate the lazy government in order to promote the construction of the system from negative inaction to positive action, and to form a virtuous circle of national public power? This is a focal issue worthy of in-depth study in contemporary political science and administration, and it is necessary to bring the lazy administration of governance into the comprehensive and strict administration of the Party as an important part of the comprehensive and strict administration of the Party.
【作者单位】： 暨南大学公共管理学院/应急管理研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科重大项目“大数据环境下社会舆情分析与决策支持研究”(14ZDC166)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D262.3
，
本文编号：2209475
[Abstract]:From the point of view of political phenomenon, the two political phenomena, which are completely different psychological orientation and behavior orientation, are political phenomena, but they are both the products of certain state power structure and social and economic relations. Both of them can exist in the same historical period and the same institutional framework at the same time. They can also exist in the historical process of social development as two kinds of extreme mentality and behavior. At the present stage of our country, on the one hand, the phenomenon of taking over political affairs is quite common, but on the other hand, lazy government is to further deepen the reform and perfect the socialist democracy and legal system. New issues in the process of modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity. What kind of historical change is it from taking over politics to being lazy? What is the basis of the social system that underpins this change? How to eliminate the lazy government in order to promote the construction of the system from negative inaction to positive action, and to form a virtuous circle of national public power? This is a focal issue worthy of in-depth study in contemporary political science and administration, and it is necessary to bring the lazy administration of governance into the comprehensive and strict administration of the Party as an important part of the comprehensive and strict administration of the Party.
【作者单位】： 暨南大学公共管理学院/应急管理研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科重大项目“大数据环境下社会舆情分析与决策支持研究”(14ZDC166)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D262.3
，
本文编号：2209475
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/2209475.html
