毛泽东是否参加中共一大南湖会议考证
发布时间：2018-10-16 21:37
【摘要】：关于毛泽东是否参加中共一大南湖会议,中共一大会议的历史亲历者留下了多种历史文本,主要有两种历史纪录:以萧子升、王会悟、刘仁静、包惠僧、张国焘、李达、周佛海等的相关回忆资料形成了相互印证的历史证据链,支持毛泽东参加了南湖会议这一历史结论;而以董必武女儿转述其父晚年的话语,显示毛泽东没有参加南湖会议。但由于此话语非口述者本人直接公开信息,属于孤证,信息不完整等因素,因而没有形成完整的证据链。立足于上述这些基本史料,通过比较、归纳,再结合当时的相关政治、社会背景知识,做一个合理的、综合的逻辑推演,最后得出的基本历史结论是:毛泽东的确参加了南湖会议,从而完整地参加了中国共产党第一次代表大会成立的历史全程。这种基于历史文献的多维、综合推理对于推进中共创建史研究也是一个有益的学术尝试。
[Abstract]:Regarding Mao Zedong's participation in the first South Lake Conference of the Communist Party of China, the historical visitors to the first Congress of the CPC have left behind many historical texts. There are mainly two kinds of historical records: Xiao Zisheng, Wang Hui Wu, Liu Renjing, Bao Huiseng, Zhang Guotao, Zhang Guotao. The relevant recollection materials of Zhou Fohai and others formed a chain of historical evidences which supported Mao Zedong's participation in the Nanhu Conference, while the words of his father's old age recounted by her daughter Dong Biwu showed that Mao Zedong had not participated in the Nanhu Conference. However, due to the fact that the utterance does not directly disclose the information, it belongs to solitary evidence and incomplete information, so it does not form a complete chain of evidence. Based on the above basic historical data, through comparison, induction, and combined with relevant political and social background knowledge at that time, to do a reasonable, comprehensive logical deduction, Finally, the basic historical conclusion is that Mao did participate in the Nanhu Conference and thus participated in the whole history of the first Congress of the Communist Party of China. This multidimensional and comprehensive reasoning based on historical literature is also a useful academic attempt to promote the study of the founding history of the Communist Party of China.
【作者单位】： 嘉兴学院中国共产党革命精神与文化资源研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地“中国共产党革命精神与文化资源研究中心”课题“价值·对话·实践:新民学会会员建立马克思主义信仰的多元路径研究”(70114014)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D231
[Abstract]:Regarding Mao Zedong's participation in the first South Lake Conference of the Communist Party of China, the historical visitors to the first Congress of the CPC have left behind many historical texts. There are mainly two kinds of historical records: Xiao Zisheng, Wang Hui Wu, Liu Renjing, Bao Huiseng, Zhang Guotao, Zhang Guotao. The relevant recollection materials of Zhou Fohai and others formed a chain of historical evidences which supported Mao Zedong's participation in the Nanhu Conference, while the words of his father's old age recounted by her daughter Dong Biwu showed that Mao Zedong had not participated in the Nanhu Conference. However, due to the fact that the utterance does not directly disclose the information, it belongs to solitary evidence and incomplete information, so it does not form a complete chain of evidence. Based on the above basic historical data, through comparison, induction, and combined with relevant political and social background knowledge at that time, to do a reasonable, comprehensive logical deduction, Finally, the basic historical conclusion is that Mao did participate in the Nanhu Conference and thus participated in the whole history of the first Congress of the Communist Party of China. This multidimensional and comprehensive reasoning based on historical literature is also a useful academic attempt to promote the study of the founding history of the Communist Party of China.
【作者单位】： 嘉兴学院中国共产党革命精神与文化资源研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地“中国共产党革命精神与文化资源研究中心”课题“价值·对话·实践:新民学会会员建立马克思主义信仰的多元路径研究”(70114014)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D231
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 苗体君;窦春芳;;中共一大代表的学历与职称[J];党史博览;2008年07期
2 董良，
本文编号：2275694
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/2275694.html
