技术风险时代的新个体伦理责任结构

发布时间：2018-01-20 04:55

本文关键词： 责任伦理技术风险个体主体责任结构生态合理性　出处：《中州学刊》2015年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在风险已成为影响人类生存、生活重要因素的技术时代,以后果确认责任承担方式的责任伦理学遭遇到了前所未有的理论困境和实践难题,表现出了"有组织地不负责任"状况。这种状况的产生,不仅表明了技术时代风险的人为性、结构性、不易控制性、潜在性等特征,而且也表明了责任伦理本身的抽象性、建构性及远离人生活的现实性等特征。个体主体作为伦理责任的真实承担者是从事实际活动的现实个人,只有个体伦理责任能力的生成及个体伦理责任行为的落实,才能从根本上使责任伦理规避风险成为可能。在技术风险时代,个体伦理责任是全面的、丰富的,它不仅表现为个体主体对自身、他人及社会的责任,而且也表现为对自然及未来人的责任。新个体伦理责任是以个体主体对自身责任为核心的"五位一体"的新结构,具有自然、社会、价值三重向度的生态合理性。
[Abstract]:In the technological age where risk has become an important factor in human survival and life, the ethics of responsibility, which confirms the way of assuming responsibility with consequences, has encountered unprecedented theoretical and practical difficulties. This kind of situation not only shows the characteristics of artificial, structural, difficult to control, potential and so on, but also shows the characteristics of "organized irresponsibility". It also shows the characteristics of responsibility ethics itself such as abstractness, constructiveness and reality far away from human life. As the real bearer of ethical responsibility, the individual subject is a real individual engaged in practical activities. Only the generation of individual ethical responsibility ability and the implementation of individual ethical responsibility behavior can make it possible to avoid risks fundamentally. In the era of technical risk, individual ethical responsibility is comprehensive and rich. It is not only the responsibility of individual subjects to themselves, others and society. The ethical responsibility of the new individual is a new structure of "five in one" with the core of the individual subject's responsibility to himself, which has the nature and the society. Ecological rationality of the triple direction of value.
【作者单位】：洛阳师范学院马列理论教研部;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“政治哲学视野下的技术正义研究”(11BZX069) 河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“美丽中国建设中的中国公民公共责任伦理研究”(2013BZX018) 河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究规划项目“后道德社会个体德性生成研究”(2016-gh-002)
【分类号】：B82-0
【正文快照】： 技术风险时代,责任伦理被普遍视为风险治理的伦理策略,其目的在于借助责任原则唤醒人们的风险和责任意识,进而为避免人类共同灾难的发生寻找一条合理的出路。但是,在风险治理的社会活动中,责任伦理却遭遇到了前所未有的困境,表现出责任主体迷失、责任失衡及“有组织地不负责任

【共引文献】