现代道德哲学主流研究方法及其困境

发布时间：2018-03-12 09:34

本文选题：现代道德哲学　切入点：罗尔斯　出处：《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：现代道德哲学研究脱离道德生活的困境的产生,和现代道德哲学所采用的主流研究方法有着密切关系。罗尔斯构建的建构主义研究方法和罗蒂提出的解构主义研究方法是现代道德哲学主流研究方法的两个典型代表。建构主义凭空构造的理论目标和建构程序决定了道德哲学研究对道德生活的背离——专业的道德哲学研究提供的理论不能被普通人理解,普通人也不能从道德哲学家那里找到解决道德实践问题的"标准答案"。解构主义的不断"重新描述"最终导致"自由"和"不遭受侮辱"成为仅有的道德追求,其他的一切道德概念都被偶然性消解了。因此,要解决现代道德哲学的研究困境,必须对其所使用的方法展开批判。一方面批判建构主义将理论目标直接作为理论前提的祛实践、非叙事的方法,另一方面批判解构主义将偶然事件作为实然前提的祛辩证、非反思的方法。
[Abstract]:The emergence of the study of modern moral philosophy from the dilemma of moral life, It is closely related to the mainstream research methods used in modern moral philosophy. The constructivism research method constructed by Rawls and the deconstruction research method put forward by Rorty are two typical research methods of modern moral philosophy. Representative. The theoretical goal and construction procedure of constructivist construction decide the deviation from moral life in moral philosophy research-the theory provided by professional moral philosophy research can not be understood by ordinary people. Nor can ordinary people find a "standard answer" to the problem of moral practice from moral philosophers. The constant "redescription" of deconstruction ultimately leads to "freedom" and "not being insulted" as the only moral pursuits. All other moral concepts have been dispelled by chance. Therefore, to solve the plight of the study of modern moral philosophy, On the one hand, the critical constructivism regards the theoretical objective as the theoretical premise, not the narrative method, on the other hand, the deconstructionism regards the accidental event as the dispelling dialectical of the real premise. A non-reflective approach.
【作者单位】：金陵科技学院马克思主义学院;
【基金】：江苏省社会科学基金项目“麦金太尔辩证叙事道德探究观研究”(14zxd002) 江苏高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目“麦金太尔伦理探究方法研究”(2014SJD203)成果之一
【分类号】：B82-0

【相似文献】