关于比较哲学方法的几个问题——从余纪元的《德性之镜》说起
发布时间：2018-08-29 12:23
【摘要】：该文从余纪元教授的比较哲学谈起,认为他的比较哲学方法可以概括为:"以友为镜"和"保留现象",即让被比较的双方互为镜鉴,通过平等的比较而知己知彼。具体做法是,首先围绕选定的问题广泛列举被比较双方的思想,然后去伪存真,做出合乎实际的判断。由此,也涉及其他几位学者,如李晨阳、黄勇、牟博、张志伟、韦宁、张祥龙等,分别在比较哲学的目的和任务、如何看待异同等问题上,各有独到见解。笔者由此总结出比较哲学的四个步骤:第一步,根据较高的普遍性原则确定比较对象;第二步,考察异同,厘清特点;第三步,做出裁决或判断;第四步,综合创新而形成新思想或理论。本文还特别讨论了比较研究是否应该做出裁决和裁决的标准问题。
[Abstract]:This paper begins with Professor Yu's comparative philosophy and holds that his method of comparative philosophy can be summed up as follows: "taking friends as mirror" and "reserving phenomenon", that is to say, let the two parties to be compared learn from each other and know each other through equal comparison. First, the ideas of the two parties are broadly listed around the selected problem, then the false thing is identified, the real thing is preserved, and the practical judgment is made. Therefore, several other scholars, such as Li Chenyang, Huang Yong, Mou Bo, Zhang Zhiwei, Wei Ning, Zhang Xianglong and so on, have their own unique views on the purpose and task of comparative philosophy and how to treat similarities and differences. The author sums up four steps of comparative philosophy: the first step is to determine the object of comparison according to the principle of higher universality; the second step is to examine the similarities and differences and clarify the characteristics; the third step is to make a judgment or judgment; the fourth step, To form a new idea or theory by synthesizing innovation. In particular, this paper discusses whether comparative studies should make decisions and the criteria for adjudication.
【作者单位】： 山东大学犹太教与跨宗教研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“文明、文化与建构和谐世界研究”(编号12&ZD010)的中期研究成果
【分类号】：B82-09
本文编号：2211194
[Abstract]:This paper begins with Professor Yu's comparative philosophy and holds that his method of comparative philosophy can be summed up as follows: "taking friends as mirror" and "reserving phenomenon", that is to say, let the two parties to be compared learn from each other and know each other through equal comparison. First, the ideas of the two parties are broadly listed around the selected problem, then the false thing is identified, the real thing is preserved, and the practical judgment is made. Therefore, several other scholars, such as Li Chenyang, Huang Yong, Mou Bo, Zhang Zhiwei, Wei Ning, Zhang Xianglong and so on, have their own unique views on the purpose and task of comparative philosophy and how to treat similarities and differences. The author sums up four steps of comparative philosophy: the first step is to determine the object of comparison according to the principle of higher universality; the second step is to examine the similarities and differences and clarify the characteristics; the third step is to make a judgment or judgment; the fourth step, To form a new idea or theory by synthesizing innovation. In particular, this paper discusses whether comparative studies should make decisions and the criteria for adjudication.
【作者单位】： 山东大学犹太教与跨宗教研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“文明、文化与建构和谐世界研究”(编号12&ZD010)的中期研究成果
【分类号】：B82-09
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 李艳辉;;《德性之镜》:比较哲学研究怎样进行?[J];中国图书评论;2009年10期
，本文编号：2211194
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/falvlunlilunwen/2211194.html
