政治、技术与人的境况——论阿伦特对人的理解
发布时间：2019-03-13 15:33
【摘要】：阿伦特在阐明一种基于行动的政治哲学的同时,也展现了一种对人的理解。她认为人既非某种类本质的存在,也非一种自主的存在,而是有着被给予性的境况性存在。为此,阿伦特明确区分了"人的境况"与"人的本性",并且以"人的境况问题"取代"人的本性问题",从而与传统人性论划清了界限。在思考人的境况时,阿伦特凸显了技术和政治两个维度,认为政治性构成了人之为人的核心,而极权政治的出现以及现代级技术的发展,都对人的原初境况构成了威胁,从而对人之为人构成了威胁。
[Abstract]:While articulating an action-based political philosophy, Arendt also showed an understanding of human beings. She thinks that human being is neither a kind of essential existence nor an autonomous existence, but a given situational existence. Therefore, Arendt clearly distinguishes "man's situation" from "human nature", and replaces "human nature" with "man's situation", thus distinguishes himself from the traditional theory of human nature. In thinking about the situation of human beings, Arendt highlights the two dimensions of technology and politics, holding that politics constitutes the core of human beings, and that the emergence of totalitarian politics and the development of modern technology pose a threat to the original situation of human beings. Thus posed a threat to the human being.
【作者单位】： 大连理工大学人文学部哲学系;大连理工大学人文学部;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大委托项目/马克思主义理论研究和建设工程重大项目(2015MZD011);国家社会科学基金青年项目(13CKS031) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(DUT16RW101)
【分类号】：B82-09
[Abstract]:While articulating an action-based political philosophy, Arendt also showed an understanding of human beings. She thinks that human being is neither a kind of essential existence nor an autonomous existence, but a given situational existence. Therefore, Arendt clearly distinguishes "man's situation" from "human nature", and replaces "human nature" with "man's situation", thus distinguishes himself from the traditional theory of human nature. In thinking about the situation of human beings, Arendt highlights the two dimensions of technology and politics, holding that politics constitutes the core of human beings, and that the emergence of totalitarian politics and the development of modern technology pose a threat to the original situation of human beings. Thus posed a threat to the human being.
【作者单位】： 大连理工大学人文学部哲学系;大连理工大学人文学部;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大委托项目/马克思主义理论研究和建设工程重大项目(2015MZD011);国家社会科学基金青年项目(13CKS031) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(DUT16RW101)
【分类号】：B82-09
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 乐小军;;汉娜·阿伦特与伦理学问题[J];哲学动态;2011年06期
2 于云;;阿伦特判断思想探赜[J];学术月刊;2014年05期
3 赵刚;;人性·良知[J];书屋;2009年12期
4 涂文娟;;邪恶的两张面孔:根本的邪恶和平庸的邪恶——汉娜·阿伦特对极权主义制度下的邪恶现象的批判[J];伦理学研究;2007年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 王s，
本文编号：2439520
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/falvlunlilunwen/2439520.html
