论巴克斯特对当代三大生态正义理论的批评
发布时间：2019-07-29 20:40
【摘要】：面对21世纪全球生态正义的实践困境,英国著名政治生态学家布赖恩·巴克斯特在生态主义意识形态立场上,展开了对新自由主义、女性主义以及马克思主义三大思潮下的生态正义理论的批评,并在此基础上提出"自我决定"的生态道德原则、"基本关心"的生态正义要求和"生态政府"的生态政治主张。这对于检审当代主流生态正义理论之得失、重塑生态政治以促进生态正义之道德践履都有重要的现实意义,但从本质上看,巴克斯特的思想依然是一个生态道德与政治构想共筑的"生态正义乌托邦"。对巴克斯特的三大批评进行思考和批判,有助于我们看清当代生态正义理论的价值与边界,进而探索生态正义的现实期许与可能路径。
[Abstract]:In the face of the practical predicament of global ecological justice in the 21st century, Brian Baxter, a famous British political ecologist, criticized the theory of ecological justice under the three major trends of thought of neoliberalism, feminism and Marxism from the standpoint of ecologism ideology, and put forward the ecological moral principle of "self-determination" on this basis. The ecological justice requirement of "basic concern" and the ecological political proposition of "ecological government". This is of great practical significance for examining the gains and losses of the contemporary mainstream ecological justice theory and reshaping ecological politics to promote the moral practice of ecological justice. However, in essence, Baxter's thought is still a "Utopia of ecological justice" built by ecological morality and political conception. Thinking and criticizing Baxter's three criticisms is helpful for us to see the value and boundary of contemporary ecological justice theory, and then to explore the realistic expectation and possible path of ecological justice.
【作者单位】： 上海工程技术大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：2017年国家社科基金一般项目“历史唯物主义视域下当代生态正义问题研究”(17BZX024)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B82-058
本文编号：2520744
[Abstract]:In the face of the practical predicament of global ecological justice in the 21st century, Brian Baxter, a famous British political ecologist, criticized the theory of ecological justice under the three major trends of thought of neoliberalism, feminism and Marxism from the standpoint of ecologism ideology, and put forward the ecological moral principle of "self-determination" on this basis. The ecological justice requirement of "basic concern" and the ecological political proposition of "ecological government". This is of great practical significance for examining the gains and losses of the contemporary mainstream ecological justice theory and reshaping ecological politics to promote the moral practice of ecological justice. However, in essence, Baxter's thought is still a "Utopia of ecological justice" built by ecological morality and political conception. Thinking and criticizing Baxter's three criticisms is helpful for us to see the value and boundary of contemporary ecological justice theory, and then to explore the realistic expectation and possible path of ecological justice.
【作者单位】： 上海工程技术大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：2017年国家社科基金一般项目“历史唯物主义视域下当代生态正义问题研究”(17BZX024)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B82-058
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 陶火生;;资本中心主义批判与生态正义[J];福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年06期
2 魏森杰;魏广志;;论国际视角下的生态正义[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2008年01期
3 姜国凡;;从生态正义到社会正义——现代文明生态转向的伦理学视域[J];河南社会科学;2012年06期
4 董伟武;;超越现代性的“阿克琉斯之踵”——论全球性生态正义的实现[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2014年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 李培超;论生态正义[N];光明日报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 马君;基督教生态正义思想研究[D];山西大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 张景阳;“生态正义”思想及其对中国生态文明建设的启示[D];中国青年政治学院;2015年
2 陶昊宇;我国国际贸易中面对的生态正义问题及其应对研究[D];南京林业大学;2015年
3 张立琴;卡逊生态正义思想研究[D];昆明理工大学;2016年
4 杨建平;“生态正义”思想的理论理性与实践理性分析[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2007年
5 魏博文;生态正义的实践理性视角[D];西北大学;2013年
，本文编号：2520744
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/falvlunlilunwen/2520744.html
